[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13423029#comment-13423029
 ] 

Hudson commented on BOOKKEEPER-349:
-----------------------------------

Integrated in bookkeeper-trunk #620 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-trunk/620/])
    BOOKKEEPER-349: Entry logger should close all the chennels which are there 
in Map, instead of closing only current channel. (umamaheswararao via sijie) 
(Revision 1365869)

     Result = UNSTABLE
sijie : 
Files : 
* /zookeeper/bookkeeper/trunk/CHANGES.txt
* 
/zookeeper/bookkeeper/trunk/bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/bookie/EntryLogger.java

                
> Entry logger should close all the chennels which are there in Map, instead of 
> closing only current channel.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-349
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-349
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: bookkeeper-server
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.0
>            Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G
>            Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G
>             Fix For: 4.2.0
>
>         Attachments: BOOKKEEPER-349.patch
>
>
> I have seen this on restarting the same bookies from same JVM( in one of mey 
> testcase which I was writing for autoRecovery work), i.e, all channels are 
> not getting closed.
> When we restart the same bookie, there are 0.log channel will be a older 
> channel. Since the current code cares about only current logChannel. So, we 
> are not releasing the older channels on EntryLogger shutdown. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to