FYI - it would also enable the partial getChildren() method On Sep 4, 2012, at 5:32 PM, charles charles <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree with > Alexander . > So why no server return children list just with the order of their creation? > 2012/9/5 Alexander Shraer <[email protected]> > Thanks Flavio. But what about just storing the list of children on the > server in the order of their creation ? Wouldn't this be consistent > with the sequential id and also cheap ? or am I missing something > > Thanks, > Alex > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Sep 4, 2012, at 3:10 AM, Alexander Shraer wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have 2 questions: >>> - why was it decided not to guarantee any order on the list returned from >>> getChildren, given that many use-cases require looking on the child with >>> the smallest id ? >>> Why not just keep this list in a sorted form on the server ? >> >> >> There is some discussion about this here: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-44 >> >> -Flavio >> >
