I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at the same time:
Building remotely on ubuntu4 <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in parallel. Cheers On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See > > https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/): > > java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already in use > at org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118) > at > org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63) > Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use > at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method) > at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344) > at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336) > at > sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199) > at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74) > at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67) > at > org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95) > at > org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125) > at > org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517) > at org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113) > > > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > >> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on >> jenkins and they are looking good so far: >> >> >> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/ >> >> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/ >> >> Patrick >> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >> > Doesn't look good, failed a second time: >> > >> > >> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/ >> > >> > java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect >> > at >> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129) >> > at >> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199) >> > >> > >> > Patrick >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <maha...@hortonworks.com> >> wrote: >> >> Good point Ted. >> >> Eugene, >> >> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat >> level? :) >> >> >> >> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not. >> >> >> >> thanks >> >> mahadev >> >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down root >> cause ? >> >>> >> >>> Thanks >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the unit >> >>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran >> >>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be >> >>>> working. >> >>>> >> >>>> Patrick >> >>>> >> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar < >> maha...@hortonworks.com> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> > Hi all, >> >>>> > >> >>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 JIRAs are >> >>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix >> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550 >> >>>> > which address the client connection issue. >> >>>> > >> >>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the >> >>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.*** >> >>>> > >> >>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so >> that >> >>>> > folks get time to test this out. >> >>>> > >> >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/ >> >>>> > >> >>>> > Should we release this? >> >>>> > >> >>>> > thanks >> >>>> > mahadev >> >>>> >> > >
