[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13698833#comment-13698833
 ] 

Rakesh R commented on BOOKKEEPER-629:
-------------------------------------

{quote}I added a change in BOOKKEEPER-588 to provide a wrapper class 
BookieSocketAddress for SSL support. after that, I think the change here would 
be easier, we don't need to let client involved in using ip or hostname, client 
should use the identifier provided by bookie server. Bookie server decide to 
use IP or hostname. so the change would be just in Bookie#getBookieAddress 
based the wrapper BookieSocketAddress.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-588?focusedCommentId=13696466&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13696466
{quote}

[~hustlmsp] I've written few test cases and updated latest patch.. 
Also would like to know, how do I incorporate BookieSocketAddress changes with 
this JIRA. Should I wait for the BOOKKEEPER-588 to push this in?

                
> Support hostname based ledger metadata to help users to change IP with 
> exitsting installation
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-629
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-629
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: bookkeeper-auto-recovery, bookkeeper-client, 
> bookkeeper-server
>    Affects Versions: 4.2.1, 4.3.0
>            Reporter: Vinay
>            Assignee: Rakesh R
>             Fix For: 4.3.0
>
>         Attachments: 1-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch, 2-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch, 
> 3-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch, 4-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch, 5-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch, 
> 6-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch, 7-BOOKKEEPER-629.patch
>
>
> Register the bookie with *hostname:port* and also store the bookie addresses 
> as *hostname:port* in ledger metadata files instead of *ip:port*
> This will help users to change the machine IP if they want without loosing 
> their data.
> Supporting hostname based installation/functionality is one of the important 
> requirement of users.
> Any thoughts?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to