[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13813253#comment-13813253
]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-1807:
---------------------------------------------------
Btw - where's the canonical definition of how reconfiguration *should* work? Is
it this implementation or are their docs somewhere else? If so, lets make sure
that with this change we sync them up. If the behavior of reconfiguration is
defined by the implementation then can we have more comments with this patch?
I.e.: to who do we send notifications and what are we expecting, etc. Just to
make sure that who ever hacks next on FLE doesn't lose sight of these
constraints.
> Observers spam each other creating connections to the election addr
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-1807
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1807
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Raul Gutierrez Segales
> Assignee: Germán Blanco
> Fix For: 3.5.0
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-1807-alex.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1807.patch,
> notifications-loop.png
>
>
> Hey [~shralex],
> I noticed today that my Observers are spamming each other trying to open
> connections to the election port. I've got tons of these:
> {noformat}
> 2013-11-01 22:19:45,819 - DEBUG [WorkerSender[myid=13]] - There is a
> connection already for server 9
> 2013-11-01 22:19:45,819 - DEBUG [WorkerSender[myid=13]] - There is a
> connection already for server 10
> 2013-11-01 22:19:45,819 - DEBUG [WorkerSender[myid=13]] - There is a
> connection already for server 6
> 2013-11-01 22:19:45,819 - DEBUG [WorkerSender[myid=13]] - There is a
> connection already for server 12
> 2013-11-01 22:19:45,819 - DEBUG [WorkerSender[myid=13]] - There is a
> connection already for server 14
> {noformat}
> and so and so on ad nauseam.
> Now, looking around I found this inside FastLeaderElection.java from when you
> committed ZOOKEEPER-107:
> {noformat}
> private void sendNotifications() {
> - for (QuorumServer server : self.getVotingView().values()) {
> - long sid = server.id;
> -
> + for (long sid : self.getAllKnownServerIds()) {
> + QuorumVerifier qv = self.getQuorumVerifier();
> {noformat}
> Is that really desired? I suspect that is what's causing Observers to try to
> connect to each other (as opposed as just connecting to participants). I'll
> give it a try now and let you know. (Also, we use observer ids that are > 0,
> and I saw some parts of the code that might not deal with that assumption -
> so it could be that too..).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
