[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
chendihao updated ZOOKEEPER-1824:
---------------------------------
Description:
We are developing a timestamp server to offer a precise auto increasing
timestamp for other processes. ZooKeeper is used to select the master and store
the persistent max offered timestamp.
Now I'm not sure if the zookeeper servers work well no matter how much I damage
the cluster randomly. So we need unit tests but ZooKeeper doesn't provides a
single-process cluster for us. Should we implement the similar code like what
HBase did in MiniZooKeeperCluster.java ?
ref https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2218
was:
We are developing a timestamp server to offer a precise auto increasing
timestamp for other processes. ZooKeeper is used to select the master and store
the persistent max offered timestamp.
Now I'm not sure if the zookeeper servers work well no matter how much I damage
the cluster randomly. So we need unit tests but ZooKeeper doesn't provides a
single-process cluster for us. Should we implement the similar code like what
HBase did in MiniZooKeeperCluster.java ?
> We need a MiniZooKeeperCluster for unit test
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-1824
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1824
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: tests
> Reporter: chendihao
>
> We are developing a timestamp server to offer a precise auto increasing
> timestamp for other processes. ZooKeeper is used to select the master and
> store the persistent max offered timestamp.
> Now I'm not sure if the zookeeper servers work well no matter how much I
> damage the cluster randomly. So we need unit tests but ZooKeeper doesn't
> provides a single-process cluster for us. Should we implement the similar
> code like what HBase did in MiniZooKeeperCluster.java ?
> ref https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2218
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
