[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13941575#comment-13941575
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1502:
--------------------------------------

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12635752/ZOOKEEPER-1502.patch
  against trunk revision 1577756.

    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests.

    +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

    +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) 
warnings.

    +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

    -1 core tests.  The patch failed core unit tests.

    +1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/1968//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/1968//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/1968//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Prevent multiple zookeeper servers from using the same data directory
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-1502
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1502
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: server
>    Affects Versions: 3.4.3
>            Reporter: Will Johnson
>            Assignee: Rakesh R
>             Fix For: 3.5.0
>
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-1502.patch
>
>
> We recently ran into an issue where two zookeepers servers which were a part 
> of two separate quorums were configured to use the same data directory.  
> Interestingly, the zookeeper servers did not seem to complain and both seemed 
> to work fine until one of them was restarted.  Once that happened all sort of 
> chaos ensued.  I understand that this is a misconfiguration should zookeeper 
> complain about this or do users need to protect themselves in some external 
> fashion?  Is a simple file lock enough or are there other things I should 
> take into consideration if it’s up to me to handle?  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to