[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13967709#comment-13967709
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1699:
--------------------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12639964/ZOOKEEPER-1699.patch
against trunk revision 1586200.
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
+1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
+1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac
compiler warnings.
+1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9)
warnings.
+1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of
release audit warnings.
-1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests.
+1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2039//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2039//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2039//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Leader should timeout and give up leadership when losing quorum of last
> proposed configuration
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-1699
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1699
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: server
> Affects Versions: 3.5.0
> Reporter: Alexander Shraer
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.5.0
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-1699.patch
>
>
> A leader gives up leadership when losing a quorum of the current
> configuration.
> This doesn't take into account any proposed configuration. So, if
> a reconfig operation is in progress and a quorum of the new configuration is
> not
> responsive, the leader will just get stuck waiting for it to ACK the reconfig
> operation, and will never timeout.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
