[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14064261#comment-14064261
 ] 

Hongchao Deng commented on ZOOKEEPER-1967:
------------------------------------------

So my motivation is that when I am working with ZK-1549, I feel the tentative 
state is a dangerous assumption. Collaboration with assumption.. Instead of 
fixing the assumption in different places, I am trying to think of a way to 
eliminate the problem from the root -- a stronger guarantee that no committed 
txns can be applied.

The tradeoff is appending twice while the second append could be very small.

> Eliminate the temp dynamic config file, find last proposed config in 
> transaction log.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-1967
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1967
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: quorum, server
>            Reporter: Alexander Shraer
>
> The .next temporary config file is created when a server acks a reconfig 
> proposal.
> During reconfig commit this file becomes the permanent dynamic config file.
> This temp file is read (if exists) during server boot to determine whether 
> there is a reconfig potentially in progress. 
> This info is also available in the transaction log, since reconfig is a 
> transaction. Initially I chose not to take this information from the 
> transaction log, mainly for simplicity, since I believed that we need the 
> last proposed reconfig info before we're processing the transaction log (for 
> example, if we'd like to contact new config servers during FLE - this is 
> discussed in ZOOKEEPER-1807). 
> It would be useful to revisit this issue and check whether we could eliminate 
> the temporary dynamic config file, finding the last proposed reconfig in the 
> the transaction log.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to