> Is it possible that multiple tests are running at the same time and
> interfere with each other ?


It wouldn't be the first time we have such problems with test cases 
overlapping. 

-Flavio

On 26 Jul 2014, at 01:00, Alexander Shraer <[email protected]> wrote:

> Looking at the log Patrick sent:
> https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/2386/testReport/junit/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/ReconfigRecoveryTest/testCurrentObserverIsParticipantInNewConfig/
> 
> This is really interesting. I see that server 2 boots and then the
> following happens:
> 
> 2014-07-25 17:12:01,159 [myid:2] - INFO
> [WorkerReceiver[myid=2]:FastLeaderElection@682] - Notification: 2
> (message format version), 2 (n.leader), 0x0 (n.zxid), 0x1 (n.round),
> LOOKING (n.state), 2 (n.sid), 0x0 (n.peerEPoch), LOOKING (my state)0
> (n.config version)
> 2014-07-25 17:12:01,161 [myid:1] - INFO
> [WorkerReceiver[myid=1]:FastLeaderElection@682] - Notification: 2
> (message format version), 2 (n.leader), 0x0 (n.zxid), 0x1 (n.round),
> LOOKING (n.state), 2 (n.sid), 0x0 (n.peerEPoch), LEADING (my state)0
> (n.config version)
> 2014-07-25 17:12:01,163 [myid:2] - INFO
> [WorkerReceiver[myid=2]:FastLeaderElection$Messenger$WorkerReceiver@293]
> - 2 Received version: 200000000 my version: 0
> 
> 
> This just doesn't make sense. First, I start it with config 100000000
> so it can't have "0 (n.config version)", second no one even
> established the first config, so who's sending it version 200000000 ?
> This is the first time it appears in he log.
> 
> 
> Is it possible that multiple tests are running at the same time and
> interfere with each other ?
> 
> 
> I'm not sure how to debug this without access to the machine and
> adding more debug messages.
> 
> 
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Alexander Shraer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Hongchao, could you please clarify what you propose ?
>> 
>> If I understand correctly we have two main options - ZK-1989 that disables
>> reconfig and keeps the old static config and a simpler fix which is to
>> check for client ports on boot and shut down the server with an error if no
>> ports were found.
>> 
>> Patrick, I'll take a look on the log. Michi and I didn't succeed to get
>> access to the build machine, which makes it very difficult to debug...
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Alex
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Hongchao Deng <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> ZK-1989 gets pretty complicated if it needs to support the full backward
>>> compatibility.
>>> 
>>> My plan is divide a small task out: simply keep the old config and make it
>>> work. There could be unexpected cases when users of old config tried to
>>> use
>>> reconfig.
>>> 
>>> Is it okay for the first alpha release?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 1974 has been committed (kudos folks!), along with a few other patches
>>>> that were ready to go.
>>>> 
>>>> Hongchao, how is 1989 coming?
>>>> 
>>>> Patrick
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Can someone take a look at this issue? The windows c client build is
>>>>> failing for a while now, would be great to fix this for 3.5.0...
>>>>> 
>>>>> ZOOKEEPER-1974 winvs2008 jenkins job failing with "unresolved external
>>>> symbol"
>>>>> 
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> On 24 July 2014 09:47, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> We've identified the issues with 1987, it would be good if folks
>>> could
>>>>>>> take a look.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Great - thanks Patrick. Added some comments to the patch.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Nothing looks unsolvable, but we should tweak things a
>>>>>>> bit before 3.5.0, esp given the current upgrade experience. The new
>>>>>>> docs will help a lot - see
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1660 which we need
>>> to
>>>>>>> review and commit.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Reading the docs, will follow-up with comments.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -rgs
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> *- Hongchao Deng*
>>> *Software Engineer, CCE*
>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to