[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Daniel Peon updated ZOOKEEPER-1814:
-----------------------------------
    Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1814_release_3_5_0.patch
                ZOOKEEPER-1814_trunk.patch

Please find attached the following files:

-ZOOKEEPER-1814_trunk.patch
-ZOOKEEPER-1814_release_3_5_0.patch

I've uploaded those patches with a non-standard naming due to they have been 
created for trunk and release_3_5_0 branches respectively. Let me know if I did 
wrong and if I should upload with different names.

Regards.

> Reduction of waiting time during Fast Leader Election
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-1814
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1814
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: leaderElection
>    Affects Versions: 3.4.5, 3.5.0
>            Reporter: Daniel Peon
>            Assignee: Daniel Peon
>             Fix For: 3.4.7, 3.5.1, 3.6.0
>
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-1814.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1814.patch, 
> ZOOKEEPER-1814.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1814.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1814.patch, 
> ZOOKEEPER-1814.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1814.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1814.patch, 
> ZOOKEEPER-1814.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1814_release_3_5_0.patch, 
> ZOOKEEPER-1814_trunk.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 24h
>  Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> FastLeader election takes long time because of the exponential backoff. 
> Currently the time is 60 seconds.
> It would be interesting to give the possibility to configure this parameter, 
> like for example for a Server shutdown.
> Otherwise, it sometimes takes so long and it has been detected a test failure 
> when executing: org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeerMainTest.
> This test case waits until 30 seconds and this is smaller than the 60 seconds 
> where the leader election can be waiting for at the moment of shutting down.
> Considering the failure during the test case, this issue was considered a 
> possible bug.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to