Thanks, Flavio.  I went ahead and filed the infra ticket:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9556


--Chris Nauroth




On 4/29/15, 3:16 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>+1 to checking with infra.
>
>-Flavio
>
>> On 29 Apr 2015, at 23:09, Chris Nauroth <[email protected]>
>>wrote:
>> 
>> For the sake of comparison to another Apache project, here is a mirror
>>of
>> Hadoop:
>> 
>> 
>>http://www.webhostingreviewjam.com/mirror/apache/hadoop/common/hadoop-2.7
>>.0
>> /
>> 
>> 
>> The checksum information in the .mds file is mirrored, but the signature
>> in the .asc file is not mirrored.  For ZooKeeper on that same mirror,
>>both
>> the signature and the checksum are missing:
>> 
>> 
>>http://www.webhostingreviewjam.com/mirror/apache/zookeeper/zookeeper-3.5.
>>0-
>> alpha/
>> 
>> 
>> I'm not familiar with the details of the mirroring configuration.  Maybe
>> it's worth filing an INFRA ticket?
>> 
>> --Chris Nauroth
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 4/29/15, 2:47 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> But is it expected that the signature files aren't propagated to the
>>> mirrors? I'd think that they should be propagated too.
>>> 
>>> -Flavio
>>> 
>>>> On 29 Apr 2015, at 19:29, Michi Mutsuzaki <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> You can find these files here: https://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/
>>>> 
>>>> I guess these files are not mirrored for security reasons.
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Flavio Junqueira
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> That's weird, we definitely generate them for the RCs, and I'm quite
>>>>> sure were publishing them:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~fpj/zookeeper-3.4.6-candidate-0/
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm not sure what's going, and Pat Hunt might know about it. I'll see
>>>>> if I can find out more in the meanwhile.
>>>>> -Flavio
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>    On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 4:13 PM, ralph tice
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I was surprised to discover that releases haven't been published with
>>>>> MD5/etc signatures since 3.3.2.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is this an intentional change by the project or an oversight?  Is
>>>>> there an
>>>>> alternative method of verifying integrity of releases?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> --Ralph
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>

Reply via email to