[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14557968#comment-14557968
 ] 

Ziyou Wang commented on ZOOKEEPER-2172:
---------------------------------------

No, it is just a bug in previous system. It just will try to reconfig the 
second node even it already join the cluster. So it also just use "reconfig 
-add" to add the second node to the participant list. 

> Cluster crashes when reconfig a new node as a participant
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2172
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2172
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: leaderElection, quorum, server
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.0
>         Environment: Ubuntu 12.04 + java 7
>            Reporter: Ziyou Wang
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: node-1.log, node-2.log, node-3.log, 
> zoo.cfg.dynamic.10000005d, zoo.cfg.dynamic.next, zookeeper-1.log, 
> zookeeper-2.log, zookeeper-3.log
>
>
> The operations are quite simple: start three zk servers one by one, then 
> reconfig the cluster to add the new one as a participant. When I add the  
> third one, the zk cluster may enter a weird state and cannot recover.
>  
>       I found “2015-04-20 12:53:48,236 [myid:1] - INFO  [ProcessThread(sid:1 
> cport:-1)::PrepRequestProcessor@547] - Incremental reconfig” in node-1 log. 
> So the first node received the reconfig cmd at 12:53:48. Latter, it logged 
> “2015-04-20  12:53:52,230 [myid:1] - ERROR 
> [LearnerHandler-/10.0.0.2:55890:LearnerHandler@580] - Unexpected exception 
> causing shutdown while sock still open” and “2015-04-20 12:53:52,231 [myid:1] 
> - WARN  [LearnerHandler-/10.0.0.2:55890:LearnerHandler@595] - ******* GOODBYE 
>  /10.0.0.2:55890 ********”. From then on, the first node and second node 
> rejected all client connections and the third node didn’t join the cluster as 
> a participant. The whole cluster was done.
>  
>      When the problem happened, all three nodes just used the same dynamic 
> config file zoo.cfg.dynamic.10000005d which only contained the first two 
> nodes. But there was another unused dynamic config file in node-1 directory 
> zoo.cfg.dynamic.next  which already contained three nodes.
>  
>      When I extended the waiting time between starting the third node and 
> reconfiguring the cluster, the problem didn’t show again. So it should be a 
> race condition problem.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to