[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14570213#comment-14570213 ]
Ziyou Wang commented on ZOOKEEPER-2172: --------------------------------------- [~shralex]thought the bug may be caused when the client connection is closed. But the result shows that the server will close the connection before the client. In correct case, the connection should be kept until the client receives the new config status. > Cluster crashes when reconfig a new node as a participant > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ZOOKEEPER-2172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2172 > Project: ZooKeeper > Issue Type: Bug > Components: leaderElection, quorum, server > Affects Versions: 3.5.0 > Environment: Ubuntu 12.04 + java 7 > Reporter: Ziyou Wang > Priority: Critical > Attachments: node-1.log, node-2.log, node-3.log, zoo-1.log, > zoo-2-1.log, zoo-2-2.log, zoo-2-3.log, zoo-2.log, zoo-3.log, > zoo.cfg.dynamic.10000005d, zoo.cfg.dynamic.next, zookeeper-1.log, > zookeeper-2.log, zookeeper-3.log > > > The operations are quite simple: start three zk servers one by one, then > reconfig the cluster to add the new one as a participant. When I add the > third one, the zk cluster may enter a weird state and cannot recover. > > I found “2015-04-20 12:53:48,236 [myid:1] - INFO [ProcessThread(sid:1 > cport:-1)::PrepRequestProcessor@547] - Incremental reconfig” in node-1 log. > So the first node received the reconfig cmd at 12:53:48. Latter, it logged > “2015-04-20 12:53:52,230 [myid:1] - ERROR > [LearnerHandler-/10.0.0.2:55890:LearnerHandler@580] - Unexpected exception > causing shutdown while sock still open” and “2015-04-20 12:53:52,231 [myid:1] > - WARN [LearnerHandler-/10.0.0.2:55890:LearnerHandler@595] - ******* GOODBYE > /10.0.0.2:55890 ********”. From then on, the first node and second node > rejected all client connections and the third node didn’t join the cluster as > a participant. The whole cluster was done. > > When the problem happened, all three nodes just used the same dynamic > config file zoo.cfg.dynamic.10000005d which only contained the first two > nodes. But there was another unused dynamic config file in node-1 directory > zoo.cfg.dynamic.next which already contained three nodes. > > When I extended the waiting time between starting the third node and > reconfiguring the cluster, the problem didn’t show again. So it should be a > race condition problem. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)