Hi, Could I get a rough idea of when ZOOKEEPER-2093 might make it into an official release? I've currently got a hack doing a similar job, and want to plan for when I can clean it up.
Thanks, Brian On 10 April 2015 at 11:42, Brian Brazil <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10 April 2015 at 11:28, Rakesh R <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Thanks Brian for the reminder. I'll go through the jira shortly. >> > > Great, thanks! > > >> >> Best Regards, >> Rakesh >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Brian Brazil [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: 10 April 2015 15:44 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Improving latency monitoring >> >> Hi, >> >> I submitted my patch on >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2093 >> 4 months ago, I'd appreciate it if someone could review it. >> >> Thanks, >> Brian >> >> On 7 January 2015 at 19:22, Brian Brazil <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I want to track how my zookeeper's latency varies over time, the >> > metrics currently offered by zookeeper only allow tracking of latency >> > since startup rather than instantaneous values. With a cumulative >> > count of requests and sum of their latencies, you can analyse their >> > changes over time and calculate average latency for a given time period. >> > >> > Zookeeper already tracks the metrics needed but doesn't expose them, >> > so I submitted https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2093 to >> > allow them to be accessed via JMX so I can hook it into the rest of my >> monitoring. >> > Would it be possible to get this change reviewed? >> > >> > >> > It would be nice to use System.nanoTime and track everything as >> > seconds (the resolution may change again in the future) in a double, >> > rather than being limited to millisecond precision. Do you think it's >> > be reasonable to also switch the implementation over, while leaving >> > the existing exports as integer milliseconds for backwards >> compatibility? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Brian >> > >> > >
