[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14584554#comment-14584554
]
Hudson commented on ZOOKEEPER-706:
----------------------------------
FAILURE: Integrated in ZooKeeper-trunk #2725 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/2725/])
ZOOKEEPER-706: Large numbers of watches can cause session re-establishment to
fail
(Chris Thunes via rgs) (rgs:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1685200)
* /zookeeper/trunk/CHANGES.txt
* /zookeeper/trunk/src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/ClientCnxn.java
*
/zookeeper/trunk/src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/test/DisconnectedWatcherTest.java
> large numbers of watches can cause session re-establishment to fail
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-706
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-706
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: c client, java client
> Affects Versions: 3.1.2, 3.2.2, 3.3.0
> Reporter: Patrick Hunt
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.4.7, 3.5.2, 3.6.0
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-706-branch-34.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-706-branch-34.patch, ZOOKEEPER-706.patch, ZOOKEEPER-706.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-706.patch
>
>
> If a client sets a large number of watches the "set watches" operation during
> session re-establishment can fail.
> for example:
> WARN [NIOServerCxn.Factory:22801:NIOServerCnxn@417] - Exception causing
> close of session 0xe727001201a4ee7c due to java.io.IOException: Len error
> 4348380
> in this case the client was a web monitoring app and had set both data and
> child watches on > 32k znodes.
> there are two issues I see here we need to fix:
> 1) handle this case properly (split up the set watches into multiple calls I
> guess...)
> 2) the session should have expired after the "timeout". however we seem to
> consider any message from the client as re-setting the expiration on the
> server side. Probably we should only consider messages from the client that
> are sent during an established session, otherwise we can see this situation
> where the session is not established however the session is not expired
> either. Perhaps we should create another JIRA for this particular issue.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
