Please see the discussion here, Camille: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2235
-Flavio On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Camille Fournier <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm checking out the tag to do a check. Do we need to do anything with > Ivan's -1? I don't want to spend time checking a release that can't move > forward due to a -1. > > Thanks, > C > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Flavio Junqueira < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > That's a good observation. The description here about what NOTICE should > > contain: > > > > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html < > > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html> > > > > says to be careful and not add unnecessarily. Having said that, the jars > > are under Apache 2.0, except these: > > > > - jline which has a license file under lib, I don't think we need to add > > it to the NOTICE file > > - slf4j has an MIT license and the license says that the copyright notice > > and the permission notice need to be included. We need to copy the > license > > under lib just like we did for jline, but again I don't think we need to > > copy it over as per the description I cited above > > - servlet-api needs an addition to NOTICE, see the discussion in > > LUCENE-4431 > > > > If I haven't missed anything, we need to add two license files and make > > one addition to NOTICE.txt. > > > > That's the longest release process ever in this project! > > > > -Flavio > > > > > On 16 Jul 2015, at 12:41, Ivan Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Michi, > > > > > > -1 > > > > > > The tarball contains a bunch of jars(under lib), but there is no > mention > > of > > > these in the NOTICE file. Perhaps phunt knows whether this is ok, but > my > > > understanding is that if you are distributing the binaries, you need to > > > mention them in the NOTICE. > > > > > > Apart from that the release looks good. I tested against midonet (my > > > companies product), wrote a small test app, ran the tests. All looked > > fine. > > > > > > -Ivan > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 8:15 PM Michi Mutsuzaki <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> We have received 2 binding +1s so far (Flavio, Michi). I'm extending > > >> the voting period to give other PMCs some more time to vote. Please > > >> vote by July 20th 2015, 23:59 UTC+0. > > >> > > >> Thanks! > > >> --Michi > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Rakesh R <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> +1 > > >>> > > >>> - Built from source. > > >>> - Ran unit tests and tested few shell cmds, JMX attributes, basic > > >> watcher behaviors. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks Michi for making the release! > > >>> > > >>> Best Regards, > > >>> Rakesh > > >>> > > >>> -----Original Message----- > > >>> From: Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés [mailto:[email protected]] > > >>> Sent: 10 July 2015 11:42 > > >>> To: [email protected] > > >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.1-alpha candidate 3 > > >>> > > >>> +1 > > >>> > > >>> My testing was: > > >>> * 3 participants + 2 observers using systemd-nspawn > > >>> * triggered elections > > >>> * ran some smoke tests with zk-shell along with more elections > > >>> > > >>> All looks good. Thanks Michi! > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -rgs > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On 9 July 2015 at 15:23, Hongchao Deng <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> +1.Ran unit test and some basic programs. It went pretty > smooth.Thanks > > >>>> Michi! > > >>>> > > >>>> - Hongchao Deng > > >>>> > > >>>>> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:09:44 -0700 > > >>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.1-alpha candidate > 3 > > >>>>> From: [email protected] > > >>>>> To: [email protected] > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Just a reminder, the vote is closing in about two days, and we > > >>>>> haven't received enough binding votes yet. Please vote when you > get a > > >> chance. > > >>>>> Thanks! > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki > > >>>>> <[email protected]> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> - Ran ant test on ubuntu. > > >>>>>> - Compiled the c client on mac. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira > > >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>> +1, I ran tests, checked license and notice files, ran release > > >>>>>>> +audit > > >>>> to make sure that rat had no issues to report. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> -Flavio > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On 28 Jun 2015, at 08:47, Michi Mutsuzaki <[email protected]> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> This is the fourth release candidate for 3.5.1-alpha. This > > >>>>>>>> candidate fixes the c client compilation error on os x found in > > >>>>>>>> the previous candidate. The full release notes is available at: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310 > > >>>> 801&version=12326786 > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and vote by July 11th 2015, 23:59 > UTC+0. > > >>>> *** > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Source files: > > >>>>>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~michim/zookeeper-3.5.1-alpha-candidate > > >>>>>>>> -3/ > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Maven staging repo: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/zookee > > >>>> per/zookeeper/3.5.1-alpha/ > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> The tag to be voted upon: > > >>>>>>>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/tags/release-3.5.1-rc > > >>>>>>>> 3/ > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the > > >> release: > > >>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Should we release this candidate? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > > >
