Is ZK-2247 just good to have or is it a blocker? My sense is that it is critical because a bad disk can cause the ensemble to stall, but I'm not sure I want to block 3.4.8 on it. Is it good if we just release 3.4.8 now and make it a blocker for 3.4.9?
-Flavio > On 19 Jan 2016, at 07:31, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Thank you Raul for the initiative. > > It would be good if we can include ZOOKEEPER-2247 into this release, it > looks like the proposed patch solves the issue. Probably needs to undergo > few more review cycles. > > Thanks, > Rakesh > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:30 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <[email protected] >> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to prepare an RC for 3.4.8 soonish (hopefully, this week). For >> now, this is the only blocker I can see: >> >> ZOOKEEPER-2355: Ephemeral node is never deleted if follower fails while >> reading the proposal packet >> >> Given the magnitude of that bug, I think it should go out with this >> release. >> >> Any other JIRA that should be included? >> >> >> -rgs >>
