[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15282863#comment-15282863
]
Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1045:
-----------------------------------------
I had looked on RB. We typically use that for reviews because it's apache
infrastructure - things like review comments might be lost on non-apache hosted
infra. Note that RB comments are also appended to the JIRA. gh.com is really
intended to be mirror for the canonical apache git.
Can you post it to RB? I wouldn't recommend splitting it up. Let me look
through it in more detail on RB and see where we're at.
Thanks!
> Quorum Peer mutual authentication
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-1045
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1045
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: server
> Reporter: Eugene Koontz
> Assignee: Rakesh R
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-1045-00.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1045-Rolling Upgrade
> Design Proposal.pdf
>
>
> ZOOKEEPER-938 addresses mutual authentication between clients and servers.
> This bug, on the other hand, is for authentication among quorum peers.
> Hopefully much of the work done on SASL integration with Zookeeper for
> ZOOKEEPER-938 can be used as a foundation for this enhancement.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
