[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15321459#comment-15321459
]
Martin Kuchta commented on ZOOKEEPER-2355:
------------------------------------------
A search for the new test failures shows them as known flaky tests
(ZOOKEEPER-1806, ZOOKEEPER-1807, ZOOKEEPER-2137), and they seem far removed
from anything this patch touches. I haven't seen them at all locally.
> Ephemeral node is never deleted if follower fails while reading the proposal
> packet
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-2355
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2355
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: quorum, server
> Reporter: Arshad Mohammad
> Assignee: Marshall McMullen
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.4.9
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2355-01.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2355-02.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2355-03.patch
>
>
> ZooKeeper ephemeral node is never deleted if follower fail while reading the
> proposal packet
> The scenario is as follows:
> # Configure three node ZooKeeper cluster, lets say nodes are A, B and C,
> start all, assume A is leader, B and C are follower
> # Connect to any of the server and create ephemeral node /e1
> # Close the session, ephemeral node /e1 will go for deletion
> # While receiving delete proposal make Follower B to fail with
> {{SocketTimeoutException}}. This we need to do to reproduce the scenario
> otherwise in production environment it happens because of network fault.
> # Remove the fault, just check that faulted Follower is now connected with
> quorum
> # Connect to any of the server, create the same ephemeral node /e1, created
> is success.
> # Close the session, ephemeral node /e1 will go for deletion
> # {color:red}/e1 is not deleted from the faulted Follower B, It should have
> been deleted as it was again created with another session{color}
> # {color:green}/e1 is deleted from Leader A and other Follower C{color}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)