[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15342909#comment-15342909
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-776:
-------------------------------------

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12740443/ZOOKEEPER-776.patch
  against trunk revision 1748630.

    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 2 new or modified tests.

    -1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/3206//console

This message is automatically generated.

> API should sanity check sessionTimeout argument
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-776
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-776
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: c client, java client
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.2, 3.3.0, 3.3.1, 3.4.6, 3.5.0
>         Environment: OSX 10.6.3, JVM 1.6.0-20
>            Reporter: Gregory Haskins
>            Assignee: Raul Gutierrez Segales
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.6.0, 3.5.3
>
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-776.patch, zookeeper-776-fix.patch, 
> zookeeper-776-fix.patch, zookeeper-776-fix.patch
>
>
> passing in a "0" sessionTimeout to ZooKeeper() constructor leads to errors in 
> subsequent operations.  It would be ideal to capture this configuration error 
> at the source by throwing something like an IllegalArgument exception when 
> the bogus sessionTimeout is specified, instead of later when it is utilized.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to