[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15342914#comment-15342914
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-2202:
--------------------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12764113/ZOOKEEPER-2202.patch
against trunk revision 1748630.
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
+1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
+1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac
compiler warnings.
+1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 2.0.3)
warnings.
+1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of
release audit warnings.
-1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests.
-1 contrib tests. The patch failed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/3205//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/3205//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/3205//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Cluster crashes when reconfig adds an unreachable observer
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-2202
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2202
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.5.0, 3.6.0
> Reporter: Raul Gutierrez Segales
> Assignee: Raul Gutierrez Segales
> Fix For: 3.6.0, 3.5.3
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2202.patch
>
>
> While adding support for reconfig() in Kazoo
> (https://github.com/python-zk/kazoo/pull/333) I found that the cluster can be
> crashed if you add an observer whose election port isn't reachable (i.e.:
> packets for that destination are dropped, not rejected). This will raise a
> SocketTimeoutException which will bring down the PrepRequestProcessor:
> {code}
> 2015-06-02 14:37:16,473 [myid:3] - WARN [ProcessThread(sid:3
> cport:-1)::QuorumCnxManager@384] - Cannot open channel to 100 at election
> address /8.8.8.8:38703
> java.net.SocketTimeoutException: connect timed out
> at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method)
> at
> java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.doConnect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:345)
> at
> java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:206)
> at
> java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:188)
> at java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(SocksSocketImpl.java:392)
> at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:589)
> at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumCnxManager.connectOne(QuorumCnxManager.java:369)
> at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.connectNewPeers(QuorumPeer.java:1288)
> at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.setLastSeenQuorumVerifier(QuorumPeer.java:1315)
> at org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.Leader.propose(Leader.java:1056)
> at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.ProposalRequestProcessor.processRequest(ProposalRequestProcessor.java:78)
> at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.PrepRequestProcessor.pRequest(PrepRequestProcessor.java:877)
> at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.PrepRequestProcessor.run(PrepRequestProcessor.java:143)
> {code}
> A simple repro can be obtained by using the code in the referenced pull
> request above and using 8.8.8.8:3888 (for example) instead of a free (but
> closed) port in the loopback.
> I think that adding an Observer (or a Participant) that isn't currently
> reachable is a valid use case (i.e.: you are provisioning the machine and
> it's not currently needed) so I think we could handle this with lower connect
> timeouts, not sure.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
