Thank you Chris. Since there is no major changes with the previous on, it would be fine. I will wait for the new release candidate and will give the feedback asap.
-Rakesh On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Camille Fournier <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds great thanks for pushing this through Chris. > > C > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Chris Nauroth <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Thank you for the diligence on the licensing issues. I can create a new > > release candidate later today. > > > > I'm going to be on vacation 7/7 - 7/16 and unreachable. I'd like to try > > to complete the release before I leave, so I'm going to shorten the > voting > > period on the next release candidate to 5 days. (I see our bylaws allow > a > > release vote to be as short as 3 days.) If there any objections to that > > plan, please let me know. > > > > --Chris Nauroth > > > > > > > > > > On 6/30/16, 12:29 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >Thank you, Pat. Have a nice break! > > > > > >-Flavio > > > > > >> On 30 Jun 2016, at 05:14, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> Thanks Flavio. I reviewed/committed both of them. > > >> > > >> Patrick > > >> > > >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]> > > >>wrote: > > >> > > >>> I have submitted two patches to fix the license issues I found. Id' > > >>> appreciate if someone could have a look at them and possibly check > > >>>them in > > >>> if LG. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> -Flavio > > > > > > > > > > >
