+1 * ran zk-shell's test suite (all passes: https://asciinema.org/a/buko9me6x0ct294cba5e9zk49) * ran an Observer w/ 3.5.2-alpha taking some (light prod traffic) (all looks good)
Thanks Chris et al! -rgs On 4 July 2016 at 05:31, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Tested Apache BookKeeper trunk (4.5.0-SNAPSHOT) > > Tested Majordodo (http://majordodo.org). These tests also include > running Apache BookKeeper 4.4.0 Client using the 3.5.2-alpha java > client. > > Tested BlazingCache (http://blazingcache.org) . These tests also > include running Apache BookKeeper 4.4.0 Client using the 3.5.2-alpha > java client. > > I have used the binary artifact published on Maven staging repo > > Regards > Enrico > > 2016-07-03 0:54 GMT+02:00 Edward Ribeiro <[email protected]>: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > - built ZK from source > > - ran all the unit tests > > - generated and checked javadocs > > - generated and checked docs > > - executed few manual test (zkCli.sh) and 4lw > > > > Some small issues (imho): > > > > - the copyright notice is still dating "2008-2013". It's worth updating > to > > the current year? > > - I consistently ran on an test error equals to the one at > > https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/2982/console > > - Also this one: > > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/zookeeper-dev/201601.mbox/%3C1279938263.1283.1453526737790.JavaMail.jenkins@crius%3E > > > > - In fact, there were 14 failing tests total (I suspect all of them > related > > to the C tests). Any ideas? A couple of flacky tests? > > > > > > Regards, > > Eddie > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> - built zookeeper jar from source, > >> - ran unit test cases, few zkCli commands, few four letter words, > >> - tested few scenarios against Hadoop-2.7.2 version(3 node Kerberos > secure > >> cluster environment). > >> > >> Thanks Chris for making the release. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Rakesh > >> > >> On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > +1 > >> > > >> > - Checked license information > >> > - Ran RAT tool > >> > - Ran tests > >> > - Ran some smoke tests > >> > - Verified digests and signature > >> > - Checked release notes > >> > > >> > All of the above LGTM > >> > > >> > -Flavio > >> > > >> > > >> > > On 01 Jul 2016, at 08:45, Chris Nauroth <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > This is a release candidate for 3.5.2-alpha. The full release notes > are > >> > > available at: > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801&v > >> > > ersion=12331981 > >> > > > >> > > *** Please download, test and vote by July 5th 2016, 23:59 UTC+0. > *** > >> > > > >> > > Source files: > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~cnauroth/zookeeper-3.5.2-alpha-candidate-1/ > >> > > > >> > > Maven staging repo: > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/zookeeper/z > >> > > ookeeper/3.5.2-alpha/ > >> > > > >> > > The tag to be voted upon: > >> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/tags/release-3.5.2-rc1/ > >> > > > >> > > ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the > release: > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS > >> > > > >> > > Should we release this candidate? > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > --Chris Nauroth > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> >
