Great, thanks Chris!

Patrick

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Chris Nauroth <cnaur...@hortonworks.com>
wrote:

> I just committed the ZOOKEEPER-2514 patch.  Patrick, thank you for the
> quick turnaround.  Rakesh, I think you’re all set to proceed with release
> notes for the 3.4.9 release candidate.
>
> --Chris Nauroth
>
> On 8/16/16, 2:52 PM, "Patrick Hunt" <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>     Rakesh pointed out that the current "how to release" docs no longer are
>     correct for branch-3.4 as in branch-3.5 and later we updated the
> release
>     notes creation process to simplify it. Used to be very manual, in 3.5+
> we
>     moved to using the HTML available from Jira. I've created the following
>     JIRA to backport that change to branch 3.4. After this patch is
> applied the
>     RM process for release notes creation in 3.4 is consistent with the
> "how to
>     release" documentation available on the wiki.
>
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2514
>
>     Chris would you be able to take a look/review as well? That would help
> to
>     unstick Rakesh with 3.4.9 (although he can review/commit as well but
> given
>     the timezone diff...)
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Patrick
>
>
>     On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Chris Nauroth <
> cnaur...@hortonworks.com>
>     wrote:
>
>     > +1 for the plan.  Rakesh, thank you for working on the 3.4.9 release.
>     >
>     > --Chris Nauroth
>     >
>     > On 8/15/16, 7:43 AM, "Rakesh Radhakrishnan" <rake...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Hi All,
>     >
>     >     I think we have given enough time to push issues into 3.4.9
> version
>     >     release. I'm planning to start looking at the jira issues
> currently
>     > marked
>     >     for 3.4.9 and move into 3.4.10. I'd like to propose a deadline,
>     > sometime
>     >     around *Tuesday, 16 August 2016 PST* to hear from you. Kindly
>     > requesting
>     >     everyone to look at the open jira issues marked for 3.4.9 and
> let me
>     > know
>     >     your thoughts asap. Thanks!
>     >
>     >     I personally feel, only ZOOKEEPER-2383 blocker could be good
> candidate
>     > for
>     >     this version. Please feel free to add your inputs and help me to
> take a
>     >     decision for this jira.
>     >
>     >     Please find the open issues here, https://goo.gl/SEliwm
>     >
>     >     Thanks,
>     >     Rakesh
>     >
>     >     On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <
>     > rake...@apache.org>
>     >     wrote:
>     >
>     >     > Hi All,
>     >     >
>     >     > (1) ZK-2383 -> Attached patch and the bug reporter has shown
>     > interests to
>     >     > review/test the available patch. @Flavio, @Patrick, do you
> have some
>     > cycles
>     >     > to review the proposed patch. Welcome others input as well.
> Thanks!
>     >     >
>     >     > (2) I believe we are very close to finish ZK-2247, waiting for
> the
>     > final
>     >     > reviews and commit.
>     >     >
>     >     > (3) I'd love to include ZK-2355 also. It looks like the fix is
> good,
>     > I've
>     >     > added few comments. Perhaps, will wait to see feedback from
> others.
>     >     >
>     >     > Kindly requesting everyone to look at your issues marked for
> 3.4.9
>     > and
>     >     > push these asap or can be pushed out to 3.4.10.
>     >     >
>     >     > Thanks,
>     >     > Rakesh
>     >     >
>     >     > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Patrick Hunt <
> ph...@apache.org>
>     > wrote:
>     >     >
>     >     >> On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan
>     >     >> <rake...@apache.org> wrote:
>     >     >> >
>     >     >> > >>>>>ZK-1045 is a major change and I suggest we give time
> for
>     > folks to
>     >     >> try
>     >     >> > it out before cutting a release candidate. Ideally, we
> check it
>     > in and
>     >     >> give
>     >     >> > a few weeks until we cut a release candidate.
>     >     >> >
>     >     >> > Agreed, will try to push ZK-1045 in asap. Michael and
> myself is
>     > working
>     >     >> > closely to finish the following set of open points.
> Hopefully by
>     > next
>     >     >> week
>     >     >> > we will be able to complete the identified tasks, then will
> post
>     > updated
>     >     >> > patch and test report. I would appreciate review
>     >     >> > comments/questions/feedback from others.
>     >     >> >
>     >     >>
>     >     >> I am taking another pass at this next.
>     >     >>
>     >     >> > Pending tasks:-
>     >     >> > 1) support authorization in sasl.
>     >     >> > 2) few minor log improvements are open.
>     >     >> > 3) system testing and preparing report.
>     >     >> > 4) feature document with latest changes.
>     >     >> >
>     >     >> >
>     >     >> > >>>>>The other one, ZK-2383, needs work.
>     >     >> >
>     >     >> > Here, I'm planning to revert ZOOKEEPER-2026 committed code
> and
>     > makes
>     >     >> this
>     >     >> > issue open for discussion/fix. Does it sound good?
>     >     >> >
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Given 2026 is already shipping I would be concerned about
> reverting
>     > it
>     >     >> at this point. Why wouldn't we just fix the remaining
> issue(s)?
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Patrick
>     >     >>
>     >     >> > Thanks,
>     >     >> > Rakesh
>     >     >> >
>     >     >> > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Flavio Junqueira <
> f...@apache.org>
>     >     >> wrote:
>     >     >> >
>     >     >> > > Thanks for bootstrapping the release process for 3.4.9.
> ZK-1045
>     > is a
>     >     >> major
>     >     >> > > change and I suggest we give time for folks to try it out
> before
>     >     >> cutting a
>     >     >> > > release candidate. Ideally, we check it in and give a few
> weeks
>     > until
>     >     >> we
>     >     >> > > cut a release candidate.
>     >     >> > >
>     >     >> > > One of the blockers, ZK-2314 has only one remaining task
> which
>     > is to
>     >     >> > > document missing SASL properties, so that should be easy.
> The
>     > other
>     >     >> one,
>     >     >> > > ZK-2383, needs work.
>     >     >> > >
>     >     >> > > Folks should check the remaining issues to determine if
> there
>     > is any
>     >     >> other
>     >     >> > > blocker that we missed in that list.
>     >     >> > >
>     >     >> > > -Flavio
>     >     >> > >
>     >     >> > > > On 07 Jul 2016, at 05:12, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <
>     > rake...@apache.org>
>     >     >> > > wrote:
>     >     >> > > >
>     >     >> > > > Hi All,
>     >     >> > > >
>     >     >> > > > I am interested in going through the release process as
> the
>     > RM.
>     >     >> > > >
>     >     >> > > > I could see total 23 issues marked for 3.4.9 release as
> of
>     > now,
>     >     >> which
>     >     >> > > > includes 2 blockers, 6 critical, 12 major and 3 minor
> issues.
>     > I
>     >     >> count 15
>     >     >> > > > issues fixed/committed already for 3.4.9 which includes
> 6
>     > blockers
>     >     >> and 2
>     >     >> > > > critical(security related) issues. I think it is a good
> time
>     > to
>     >     >> initiate
>     >     >> > > > the discussion of 3.4.9 release processes.
>     >     >> > > >
>     >     >> > > > Please find the open issues here, https://goo.gl/SEliwm
>     >     >> > > >
>     >     >> > > > Currently, I'm focusing on ZOOKEEPER-1045 sasl feature
> which I
>     >     >> think is
>     >     >> > > > much appreciated/awaited feature and I'd like to
> include this
>     > if
>     >     >> everyone
>     >     >> > > > agrees. Appreciate help in reviewing/testing the patch
> and
>     > making it
>     >     >> > > stable
>     >     >> > > > for release. Also, please feel free to push your
> favorite
>     > issues
>     >     >> ahead of
>     >     >> > > > 3.4.9 release.
>     >     >> > > >
>     >     >> > > > I hope we should be able to close all blockers and
> critical
>     > issues
>     >     >> in a
>     >     >> > > > month. Kindly requesting everyone to look at the issues
>     > marked for
>     >     >> 3.4.9
>     >     >> > > > and push these asap or can be pushed out to 3.4.10. I
> will
>     > focus my
>     >     >> code
>     >     >> > > > review time on these.
>     >     >> > > >
>     >     >> > > > Please let me know your thoughts on the plan.
>     >     >> > > >
>     >     >> > > > Thanks,
>     >     >> > > > Rakesh
>     >     >> > >
>     >     >> > >
>     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>
>
>

Reply via email to