[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15712555#comment-15712555
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ZOOKEEPER-2517:
-------------------------------------------

Github user hanm commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/113
  
    +1, looks good. We should definitely get this in before cutting RC build 
for 3.5.3.


> jute.maxbuffer is ignored
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2517
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2517
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.2
>            Reporter: Benjamin Jaton
>            Assignee: Arshad Mohammad
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 3.5.3, 3.6.0
>
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2517-01.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2517-02.patch, 
> ZOOKEEPER-2517-03.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2517-04.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2517.patch
>
>
> In ClientCnxnSocket.java the parsing of the system property is erroneous:
> {code}packetLen = Integer.getInteger(
>   clientConfig.getProperty(ZKConfig.JUTE_MAXBUFFER),
>   ZKClientConfig.CLIENT_MAX_PACKET_LENGTH_DEFAULT
> );{code}
> Javadoc of Integer.getInteger states "The first argument is treated as the 
> name of a system property", whereas here the value of the property is passed.
> Instead I believe the author meant to write something like:
> {code}packetLen = Integer.parseInt(
>   clientConfig.getProperty(
>     ZKConfig.JUTE_MAXBUFFER,
>     String.valueOf(ZKClientConfig.CLIENT_MAX_PACKET_LENGTH_DEFAULT)
>   )
> );{code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to