[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15826940#comment-15826940
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ZOOKEEPER-2642:
-------------------------------------------

Github user hanm commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/122
  
    Just to close the loop here:
    
    The PR for master branch is now: 
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/152
    The PR for branch-3.5 is now: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/151


> ZOOKEEPER-2014 breaks existing clients for little benefit
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2642
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2642
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: c client, java client
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.2
>            Reporter: Jordan Zimmerman
>            Assignee: Jordan Zimmerman
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 3.5.3, 3.6.0
>
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2642-3.5.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2642.patch, 
> ZOOKEEPER-2642.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2642.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2642.patch, 
> ZOOKEEPER-2642.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2642.patch
>
>
> ZOOKEEPER-2014 moved the reconfig() methods into a new class, ZooKeeperAdmin. 
> It appears this was done to document that these are methods have access 
> restrictions. However, this change breaks Apache Curator (and possibly other 
> clients). Curator APIs will have to be changed and/or special methods need to 
> be added. A breaking change of this kind should only be done when the benefit 
> is overwhelming. In this case, the same information can be conveyed with 
> documentation and possibly a deprecation notice.
> Revert the creation of the ZooKeeperAdmin class and move the reconfig() 
> methods back to the ZooKeeper class with additional documentation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to