This approach makes sense to me. Perhaps now would be a good time to reevaluate whether or not ZOOKEEPER-2159 and ZOOKEEPER-1159 actually need to be blockers.
Abe On Mon, Mar 6, 2017, at 14:54, Michael Han wrote: > Hi all, > > We all know that a stable 3.5 release is long awaited by community. > Previously we were on hold because of a security related issue > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2014> around dynamic > reconfiguration and most recently a CVE > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2693> around four letter > words. Now with both issues resolved in branch-3.5, I think we are ready > to > move forward with 3.5.3 beta release and hopefully in near future, ship > the > stable 3.5 release after this. So I am taking a stab here to start the > discussion on the plan of moving 3.5.3-beta forward. > > Currently there are six blocker issues > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2693?jql=project%20%3D%20ZOOKEEPER%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.5.3> > targeting 3.5.3: > ZOOKEEPER-2693 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2693>: > already resolved for branch-3.5. The issue is still open because of > remaining work for branch-3.4. > ZOOKEEPER-761 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-761>: > already resolved for branch-3.5. The issue is still open because of some > potential changes required for branch-3.4. > > As for the remaining issues marked as blocker, I'd like to propose we > push > them to next release because these issues are not regressions - unless we > think some of them are absolutely required to get resolved for 3.5.3. > ZOOKEEPER-2317 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2317> > ZOOKEEPER-2159 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2159> > ZOOKEEPER-1549 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1549> > ZOOKEEPER-1159 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1159> > > I will start doing the work to defer all JIRA issues targeting 3.5.3 to > 3.5.4 by end of this week (*3/10*) if no objections. After that will cut > a > RC build for 3.5.3. > > Please let me know what you think about this plan and any concerns / > comments are welcome. > > -- > Cheers > Michael.
