[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15901720#comment-15901720
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ZOOKEEPER-2709:
-------------------------------------------
Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/182#discussion_r104986881
--- Diff: src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/zookeeperProgrammers.xml
---
@@ -841,9 +841,9 @@
itself, ZooKeeper associates all the ids that correspond to a
client with the clients connection. These ids are checked against
the ACLs of znodes when a clients tries to access a node. ACLs are
- made up of pairs of <emphasis>(scheme:expression,
+ made up of pairs of <emphasis>(scheme:id,
--- End diff --
> I think continuing to refer to the second term as an "expression" and
explaining exactly what an "expression" is may be clearer.
Ok, I can do that instead. I was trying to consolidate the use of "id" and
"expression" in these different contexts to prevent more confusion (as you
realized). Will try to come up with something better :)
> Clarify documentation around "auth" ACL scheme
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-2709
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2709
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: documentation
> Reporter: Josh Elser
> Priority: Minor
>
> We recently found up in HBASE-17717 that we were incorrectly setting an ACL
> on our "sensitive" znodes after the output of {{getACL}} on these nodes
> didn't match what was expected.
> In referencing the documentation about how the {{auth}} ACL scheme was
> supposed to work, it was unclear if it was a ZooKeeper bug or an HBase bug.
> After reading some ZooKeeper code, we found that it was an HBase bug, but it
> would be nice to clarify the docs around this ACL scheme.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
