Github user hanm commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/229
  
    Thanks for work on this! I hope we have more contributors focus on 
improving the test.
    
    The proposed fix masks the real problem - it will always success no matter 
what - even if the connection was succeeded, since the halt will clean up the 
sender worker map of the peer 0.
    
    >>  a race condition between the removal of the relevant sid from 
senderWorkerMap for peer0 and the 3 second delay from 
assertEventuallyNotConnected.
    I think there is a race, but my observation on it is slightly different. 
The race is between when peer 0 received (and finished) establish connection 
with peer 1, and the assert inside assertEventuallyNotConnected.
    
    >> may not destroy them in time for the test assertion.
    Because of the race, once peer 0 has received the connection, its sender 
worker map will has sid 1 entry forever until the death of the peer 0 itself. 
    
    I think instead of checking on peer 0, we can check peer 1. Its sender 
worker map should always be clean. We can't check peer 0 here because the 
current API does not encode the true state of the connection - it only encodes 
what happened (the connection from 1 to 0 was established on 0's side), but it 
does not encode the status of the connection (is the connection still alive or 
not - in this case peer 1 will close the socket later when it found out peer 0 
has no auth. but on peer 0 side the sender work will have sid 1 inside until 
its death, what's done has been done.). The state of peer 1 wrt its sender map 
should also reflect state of peer 0  since there is only a single connection 
between 0 and 1.
    
    Something like this should serve the purpose:
    assertEventuallyNotConnected(peer1, 0);
    
    Maybe add a sleep before it to make sure all the connection attempts were 
made (from 0  to 1 and from 1 to 0 two ways), but it's a best effort. 5 sec 
sounds enough.
    



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to