Michael Han:
I'm using ZooKeeper 3.4.9 . Will this problem be fixed in 3.4.X?? JiangJiafu ------------------ ???????? ------------------ ??????: "Michael Han";<[email protected]>; ????????: 2017??5??3??(??????) ????11:50 ??????: "dev"<[email protected]>; ????: Re: Is it good for Session management to use system time ? >> I think it may be better to use System.nanoTime() because it can achieve the same goal without any problem. Yes, and this has been fixed in ZOOKEEPER-1366 which is included in 3.5.1 and later versions. Which version of ZK you are using? On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:09 AM, ?????? <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using ZooKeepr in a multi-node environment, I found that if the > machine time changes, the ephemeral node may exist for a long time even > that the client has disconnected with ZooKeeper server. > I read the source code and I find that the SessionTracker use > System.currentTimeMills() to record the time. I think it may be better to > use System.nanoTime() because it can achieve the same goal without any > problem. > I don't know whether I'm right. Can anyone give me suggestions? > > > > JiangJiafu -- Cheers Michael.
