[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16016915#comment-16016915
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ZOOKEEPER-2784:
-------------------------------------------

Github user asdf2014 commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/257#discussion_r117406260
  
    --- Diff: 
src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/QuorumCnxManager.java ---
    @@ -660,6 +665,9 @@ public void run() {
                                 "Ignoring exception", ie);
                         }
                         closeSocket(client);
    +                } catch (ConfigException ce) {
    +                    LOG.error(ce.getMessage());
    +                    throw new RuntimeException(ce);
    --- End diff --
    
    You are right. Throwing 'RuntimeException' does skip the closing 
`ServerSocket` part, so I moved it to the end of the` run` method.


> Add some limitations on code level for `SID` to avoid configuration problem
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2784
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2784
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: quorum
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.2
>            Reporter: Benedict Jin
>             Fix For: 3.6.0
>
>   Original Estimate: 168h
>  Remaining Estimate: 168h
>
> As so far, `QuorumCnxManager#receiveConnection` cannot find out the same 
> `SID` problem, then the Zookeeper cluster will start successfully. But the 
> cluster is not health, and it will throw some problem like `not 
> synchronized`. So, i thought we should add some limitations on code level for 
> `SID` to find those configuration problem more early.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to