[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16018073#comment-16018073
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ZOOKEEPER-2778:
-------------------------------------------
Github user afine commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/247#discussion_r117582004
--- Diff: src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/QuorumPeer.java
---
@@ -682,27 +682,19 @@ public void setQuorumAddress(InetSocketAddress addr){
}
public InetSocketAddress getElectionAddress(){
- synchronized (QV_LOCK) {
- return myElectionAddr;
- }
+ return myElectionAddr;
--- End diff --
> All set code path was protected by QV_LOCK already, which implies that
whoever calls set* should already acquire the QV_LOCK.
Not sure about this one. `setElectionAddress` is called by
`recreateSocketAddresses` which is called by `QuorumCnxManager#Listener.run`
without acquiring QV_LOCK. Not sure what the implication of this is. Although I
believe you are correct about `setClientAddress`.
> if we get out dated addr (in case the current quorum peer is being
reconfigured) and sent this to another peer, another peer will not able to
connect but that's fine, it will retry until at certain point later it will get
correct information.
What is the behavior if we are able to connect to the "incorrect peer".
Will we eventually disconnect or do we stay connected until reconfiguration
occurs again?
> Potential server deadlock between follower sync with leader and follower
> receiving external connection requests.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-2778
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2778
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: quorum
> Affects Versions: 3.5.3
> Reporter: Michael Han
> Assignee: Michael Han
> Priority: Critical
>
> It's possible to have a deadlock during recovery phase.
> Found this issue by analyzing thread dumps of "flaky" ReconfigRecoveryTest
> [1]. . Here is a sample thread dump that illustrates the state of the
> execution:
> {noformat}
> [junit] java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED
> [junit] at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.getElectionAddress(QuorumPeer.java:686)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumCnxManager.initiateConnection(QuorumCnxManager.java:265)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumCnxManager.connectOne(QuorumCnxManager.java:445)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumCnxManager.receiveConnection(QuorumCnxManager.java:369)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumCnxManager$Listener.run(QuorumCnxManager.java:642)
> [junit]
> [junit] java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED
> [junit] at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumCnxManager.connectOne(QuorumCnxManager.java:472)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.connectNewPeers(QuorumPeer.java:1438)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.setLastSeenQuorumVerifier(QuorumPeer.java:1471)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.Learner.syncWithLeader(Learner.java:520)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.Follower.followLeader(Follower.java:88)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.run(QuorumPeer.java:1133)
> {noformat}
> The dead lock happens between the quorum peer thread which running the
> follower that doing sync with leader work, and the listener of the qcm of the
> same quorum peer that doing the receiving connection work. Basically to
> finish sync with leader, the follower needs to synchronize on both QV_LOCK
> and the qmc object it owns; while in the receiver thread to finish setup an
> incoming connection the thread needs to synchronize on both the qcm object
> the quorum peer owns, and the same QV_LOCK. It's easy to see the problem here
> is the order of acquiring two locks are different, thus depends on timing /
> actual execution order, two threads might end up acquiring one lock while
> holding another.
> [1]
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.ReconfigRecoveryTest.testCurrentServersAreObserversInNextConfig
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
