[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16022221#comment-16022221
 ] 

Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1277:
-----------------------------------------

[~benedict jin] Not sure I follow that question. I believe it should be ok to 
add a new server during a re-election, even if that election were triggered by 
a epoch overflow. I've never tried that however.

> servers stop serving when lower 32bits of zxid roll over
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-1277
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1277
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: server
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.3
>            Reporter: Patrick Hunt
>            Assignee: Patrick Hunt
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 3.3.5, 3.4.4, 3.5.0
>
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-1277_br33.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1277_br33.patch, 
> ZOOKEEPER-1277_br33.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1277_br33.patch, 
> ZOOKEEPER-1277_br34.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1277_br34.patch, 
> ZOOKEEPER-1277_trunk.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1277_trunk.patch
>
>
> When the lower 32bits of a zxid "roll over" (zxid is a 64 bit number, however 
> the upper 32 are considered the epoch number) the epoch number (upper 32 
> bits) are incremented and the lower 32 start at 0 again.
> This should work fine, however in the current 3.3 branch the followers see 
> this as a NEWLEADER message, which it's not, and effectively stop serving 
> clients. Attached clients seem to eventually time out given that heartbeats 
> (or any operation) are no longer processed. The follower doesn't recover from 
> this.
> I've tested this out on 3.3 branch and confirmed this problem, however I 
> haven't tried it on 3.4/3.5. It may not happen on the newer branches due to 
> ZOOKEEPER-335, however there is certainly an issue with updating the 
> "acceptedEpoch" files contained in the datadir. (I'll enter a separate jira 
> for that)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to