[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16091905#comment-16091905
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ZOOKEEPER-2841:
-------------------------------------------

Github user andschwa commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/313
  
    @hanm this backports #306 to `branch-3.4`. I think I caught everything, but 
do give it a review. The build changed a bit between 3.4 and 3.5, so I had to 
remove some files from `CMakeLists.txt`, and I set the version to `3.4.10`. 
Then there were some fixes I had to do a bit differently (moved the `#define 
random` into `zookeeper.c` since `addrvec.c` wasn't created yet, reapply the 
changes I made to `zookeeper_interest` by hand, and one trivial merge conflict 
in `recordio.h`).
    
    I build and ran the tests on Linux, all passing save:
    
    ```
    1: Zookeeper_simpleSystem::testAsyncWatcherAutoResetterminate called after 
throwing an instance of 'CppUnit::Exception'
    1:   what():  equality assertion failed
    1: - Expected: -101
    1: - Actual  : -4
    ```
    
    which is odd. Is it a flaky test, or very machine dependent?
    
    I built on Windows, and it all compiled and linked successfully. If you 
want, I can integration test it. I probably should anyway so I can move Mesos 
on Windows back to down to ZK 3.4 instead of 3.5.


> ZooKeeper public include files leak porting changes
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2841
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2841
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: c client
>         Environment: Windows 10 with Visual Studio 2017
>            Reporter: Andrew Schwartzmeyer
>            Assignee: Andrew Schwartzmeyer
>              Labels: windows
>
> The fundamental problem is that the port of the C client to Windows is now 
> close to six years old, with very few updates. This port leaks a lot of 
> changes that should be internal to ZooKeeper, and many of those changes are 
> simply no longer relevant. The correct thing to do is attempt to refactor the 
> Windows port for new versions of ZooKeeper, removing dead/unneeded porting 
> code, and moving dangerous porting code to C files instead of public headers.
> Two primary examples of this problem are 
> [ZOOKEEPER-2491|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2491] and 
> [MESOS-7541|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7541].
> The first issue stems from this ancient porting code:
> {noformat}
> #define snprintf _snprintf
> {noformat}
>  in 
> [winconfig.h|https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/ddf0364903bf7ac7cd25b2e1927f0d9d3c7203c4/src/c/include/winconfig.h#L179].
>  Newer versions of Windows C libraries define {{snprintf}} as a function, and 
> so it cannot be redefined.
> The second issue comes from this undocumented change:
> {noformat}
> #undef AF_INET6
> {noformat}
> again in 
> [winconfig.h|https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/ddf0364903bf7ac7cd25b2e1927f0d9d3c7203c4/src/c/include/winconfig.h#L169]
>  which breaks any library that uses IPv6 and {{winsock2.h}}.
> Furthermore, the inclusion of the following defines and headers causes 
> terrible problems for consuming libraries, as they leak into ZooKeeper's 
> public headers:
> {noformat}
> #define _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS
> #define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN
> #include <Windows.h>
> #include <Winsock2.h>
> #include <winstdint.h>
> #include <process.h>
> #include <ws2tcpip.h>
> {noformat}
> Depending on the order that a project includes or compiles files, this may or 
> may not cause {{WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN}} to become unexpectedly defined, and 
> {{windows.h}} to be unexpectedly included. This problem is exacberated by the 
> fact that the {{winsock2.h}} and {{windows.h}} headers are order-dependent 
> (if you read up on this, you'll see that defining {{WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN}} was 
> meant to work-around this).
> Going forward, porting changes should live next to where they are used, 
> preferably in source files, not header files, so they remain contained.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to