[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16199312#comment-16199312
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-2915:
--------------------------------------

-1 overall.  GitHub Pull Request  Build
      

    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    +0 tests included.  The patch appears to be a documentation patch that 
doesn't require tests.

    +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

    +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 3.0.1) 
warnings.

    +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

    -1 core tests.  The patch failed core unit tests.

    +1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/1096//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/1096//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/1096//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Use "strict" conflict management in ivy
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2915
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2915
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.4, 3.6.0, 3.4.11
>            Reporter: Abraham Fine
>            Assignee: Abraham Fine
>
> Currently it is very difficult to tell exactly which dependencies make it 
> into the final classpath of zookeeper. We do not perform any conflict 
> resolution between the test and default classpaths (this has resulted in 
> strange behavior with the slf4j-log4j12 binding) and have no way of telling 
> if a change to the dependencies has altered the transitive dependencies 
> pulled down by the project. 
> Our dependency list is relatively small so we should use "strict" conflict 
> management (break the build when we try to pull two versions of the same 
> dependency) so we can exercise maximum control over the classpath. 
> Note: I also attempted to find a way to see if I could always prefer 
> transitive dependencies from the default configuration over those pulled by 
> the test configuration (to make sure that the zookeeper we test against has 
> the same dependencies as the one we ship) but this appears to be impossible 
> (or at least incredibly difficult) with ivy. Any opinions here would be 
> greatly appreciated.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to