[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

xiangyq000 updated ZOOKEEPER-2959:
----------------------------------
    Summary: ignore epoch proposal and ack from observers when a newly elected 
leader computes new epoch  (was: ignore epoch proposal and ack from observer 
when a newly elected leader computes new epoch)

> ignore epoch proposal and ack from observers when a newly elected leader 
> computes new epoch
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2959
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2959
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.4.11
>            Reporter: xiangyq000
>
> Once the ZooKeeper cluster finishes the election for new leader, all learners 
> report their accepted epoch to the leader for the computation of new cluster 
> epoch.
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.Leader#getEpochToPropose
> {code:java}
>     private HashSet<Long> connectingFollowers = new HashSet<Long>();
>     public long getEpochToPropose(long sid, long lastAcceptedEpoch) throws 
> InterruptedException, IOException {
>         synchronized(connectingFollowers) {
>             if (!waitingForNewEpoch) {
>                 return epoch;
>             }
>             if (lastAcceptedEpoch >= epoch) {
>                 epoch = lastAcceptedEpoch+1;
>             }
>             connectingFollowers.add(sid);
>             QuorumVerifier verifier = self.getQuorumVerifier();
>             if (connectingFollowers.contains(self.getId()) && 
>                                             
> verifier.containsQuorum(connectingFollowers)) {
>                 waitingForNewEpoch = false;
>                 self.setAcceptedEpoch(epoch);
>                 connectingFollowers.notifyAll();
>             } else {
>                 long start = Time.currentElapsedTime();
>                 long cur = start;
>                 long end = start + self.getInitLimit()*self.getTickTime();
>                 while(waitingForNewEpoch && cur < end) {
>                     connectingFollowers.wait(end - cur);
>                     cur = Time.currentElapsedTime();
>                 }
>                 if (waitingForNewEpoch) {
>                     throw new InterruptedException("Timeout while waiting for 
> epoch from quorum");        
>                 }
>             }
>             return epoch;
>         }
>     }
> {code}
> The computation will get an outcome once :
> # The leader has reported its epoch.
> # The number of all reporters is greater than half quorum, i.e., half of 
> PARTICIPANTS.
> The problem is, an observer server is not a PARTICIPANT, while this procedure 
> treat observers as participants.
> Supposed that the cluster consists of 1 leader, 2 followers and 1 observer, 
> and now the leader and the observer have reported their epoch while neither 
> of the followers has. Thus, the connectingFollowers set consists of two 
> elements, resulting in a size of 2, which is greater than half quorum, 
> namely, 2. So the if condition is met.
> This procedure can be confusing. 
> # The  connectingFollowers set can contain elements of SID of observers. (In 
> fact, at least it must contain the SID of the leader).
> # The intent of QuorumVerifier#containsQuorum is to check whether a set of 
> PARTICIPANTS makes a quorum. However, here it just regards a set of peers as 
> a set of participants.
> There are 2 candidate solutions.
> # Ignore epoch from observers.
> # require (number_of_reported_peers > number_of_all_peers / 2) , instead of 
> existing (number_of_reported_peers > number_of_all_participants / 2).
> The similar confusion exists in the following procedure when the leader 
> counts the ACKs for the new epoch from learners.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to