Ok, I can have a look at ZK-2901. I'd like to get ZK-2982 in as well as it is causing us problems with Kubernetes. The fix is simple, but I'm wondering about adding a test case.
-Flavio > On 14 Mar 2018, at 17:30, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would like to cut 3.5.4. Need more eyes on 2901 though. > > Patrick > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think ZK-2901 is close to being merged, yes? And with that, will we cut >> a 3.5.4 release? >> >> -Flavio >> >>> On 7 Dec 2017, at 00:27, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I haven't forgotten about this - we've been stuck on ZOOKEEPER-2901 . I >>> think we getting closer but it's been tricky to navigate addressing the >>> issue vs backward compat vs making things worse. I was about to sign off >>> then noticed I had missed something. Jordan has been working to address. >>> >>> Camille, Edward -- it would be good if you could take a look at 2901 >> given >>> you participated in the original creation/commit of this feature. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Patrick >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Karan Mehta <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Can we get ZOOKEEPER-2770 >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2770> in as well? The >> PR >>>> is ready for review at https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/307 >>>> It will be a nice feature addition. Thanks! >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Karan >>>> ᐧ >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Afaict the only real blocker for the release at this point is >>>>>> ZOOKEEPER-2901 - Jordan can you resolve the comments, after which we >>>>> should >>>>>> be good to go. LMK if there's anything I'm missing. >>>>> >>>>> I'll have this done in the next day or so. Please wait for me if you >> can! >>>>> >>>>> -Jordan >>>> >> >>
