This is my patch
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/546

One question:
I would like to force the cluster to change leader in
HierarchicalQuorumTest, so that I can test that JMX will reflect the new
status of the group.
Any idea about how to bounce the leader ?

Cheers
Enrico

Il giorno mer 20 giu 2018 alle ore 13:45 Enrico Olivelli <
eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto:

> This is my JIRA
> I am going to work on a patch
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3066
>
> Enrico
>
> Il gio 10 mag 2018, 19:47 Andor Molnar <an...@cloudera.com> ha scritto:
>
>> "in order to guess which is the leader I have to ask to all of the three
>> nodes in the cluster"
>>
>> That's correct.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Andor
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 4:07 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Il giorno mer 9 mag 2018 alle ore 20:24 Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>> ha
>> > scritto:
>> >
>> > > iiuc what you are interested in the information is already available.
>> The
>> > > beans have a "state" attribute which indicates following vs leading.
>> > >
>> > > Try attaching a jconsole to the running servers, use the "mbeans" tab
>> and
>> > > open org.apache.ZooKeeperService -> replicatedserver -> replica ->
>> > > attributes, you'll see the "state" attribute there.
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > Patrick,
>> > I can't find this information.
>> > If I log into a "follower" I get this info only for the 'current
>> replica'
>> >
>> > Example, I have three peers,  the first one is a "Follower", on JMX I
>> have
>> > o.a.ZookKeeperService - ReplicatedServer_id1 - replica_1 - ClientAddress
>> > o.a.ZookKeeperService - ReplicatedServer_id1 - replica_1 -
>> ElectionAddress
>> > o.a.ZookKeeperService - ReplicatedServer_id1 - replica_1 - LearnerType
>> > o.a.ZookKeeperService - ReplicatedServer_id1 - replica_1 - Name
>> > o.a.ZookKeeperService - ReplicatedServer_id1 - replica_1 - QuorumAddress
>> > o.a.ZookKeeperService - ReplicatedServer_id1 - replica_1 - State =
>> > following
>> > o.a.ZookKeeperService - ReplicatedServer_id1 - replica_1 - ConfigVersion
>> > .....
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > for other peers I see only
>> > o.a.ZookKeeperService - ReplicatedServer_id1 - replica_2 - ClientAddress
>> > o.a.ZookKeeperService - ReplicatedServer_id1 - replica_2 -
>> ElectionAddress
>> > o.a.ZookKeeperService - ReplicatedServer_id1 - replica_2 - LearnerType
>> > o.a.ZookKeeperService - ReplicatedServer_id1 - replica_2 - Name
>> > o.a.ZookKeeperService - ReplicatedServer_id1 - replica_2 - QuorumAddress
>> >
>> > o.a.ZookKeeperService - ReplicatedServer_id1 - replica_3 - ClientAddress
>> > o.a.ZookKeeperService - ReplicatedServer_id1 - replica_3 -
>> ElectionAddress
>> > o.a.ZookKeeperService - ReplicatedServer_id1 - replica_3 - LearnerType
>> > o.a.ZookKeeperService - ReplicatedServer_id1 - replica_3 - Name
>> > o.a.ZookKeeperService - ReplicatedServer_id1 - replica_3 - QuorumAddress
>> >
>> >
>> > so quering only this server I cannot guess which is the current leader,
>> the
>> > only information I can extract is:
>> > - I am a follower
>> > - We are a cluster of three
>> > - Every of the three is a PARTECIPANT (no observers)
>> >
>> > in order to guess which is the leader I have to ask to all of the three
>> > nodes in the cluster
>> >
>> > Am I missing something ? I am running 3.5.3-BETA
>> >
>> > Enrico
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Patrick
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:02 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Thank you Edward
>> > > >
>> > > > I will pack all together and send out a patch as soon as I have
>> time.
>> > > > I am running 3.5 in production and given than an RC for 3.5.4 is
>> going
>> > to
>> > > > be cut soon I will have to wait for 3.5.5 and I assume it won't be
>> > > > immediate.
>> > > >
>> > > > Cheers
>> > > > Enrico
>> > > >
>> > > > Il giorno mer 9 mag 2018 alle ore 14:37 Edward Ribeiro <
>> > > > edward.ribe...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Sent before finishing the previous email. Only to complement, the
>> > > > > findLeader() could have been as below, but this change is only a
>> > nitty
>> > > > > detail and totally irrelevant to the questions you are asking. :)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > /**
>> > > > >  * Returns the address of the node we think is the leader.
>> > > > >  */
>> > > > > protected QuorumServer findLeader() {
>> > > > >
>> > > > >     // Find the leader by id
>> > > > >     long currentLeader = self.getCurrentVote().getId();
>> > > > >
>> > > > >     QuorumServer leaderServer = self.getView().get(currentLeader);
>> > > > >
>> > > > >     if (leaderServer == null) {
>> > > > >         LOG.warn("Couldn't find the leader with id = {}",
>> > > currentLeader);
>> > > > >     }
>> > > > >     return leaderServer;
>> > > > > }
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Edward
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Edward Ribeiro <
>> > > edward.ribe...@gmail.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi Enrico,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Well, I am not an expert on QuorumPeer either (not an expert on
>> > > > anything,
>> > > > > > really), but maybe it's the variable and method below?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > ----------------- QuorumPeer ------------------
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > /**
>> > > > > >  * This is who I think the leader currently is.
>> > > > > >  */
>> > > > > > volatile private Vote currentVote;
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > public synchronized Vote getCurrentVote(){
>> > > > > >     return currentVote;
>> > > > > > }
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > ---------------------------------------
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Then it's a matter of calling
>> quorumPeer.getCurrentVote().getId()
>> > and
>> > > > > > quorumPeer.getServerState()?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Btw, the Learner class has this handy method below (self is a
>> > > > > QuorumPeer):
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > ---------------- Learner --------------------
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > /**
>> > > > > >  * Returns the address of the node we think is the leader.
>> > > > > >  */
>> > > > > > protected QuorumServer findLeader() {
>> > > > > >     QuorumServer leaderServer = null;
>> > > > > >     // Find the leader by id
>> > > > > >     Vote current = self.getCurrentVote();
>> > > > > >     for (QuorumServer s : self.getView().values()) {
>> > > > > >         if (s.id == current.getId()) {
>> > > > > >             leaderServer = s;
>> > > > > >             break;
>> > > > > >         }
>> > > > > >     }
>> > > > > >     if (leaderServer == null) {
>> > > > > >         LOG.warn("Couldn't find the leader with id = "
>> > > > > >                 + current.getId());
>> > > > > >     }
>> > > > > >     return leaderServer;
>> > > > > > }
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > ---------------------------------------
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > By the way, as a side note, the map traversal could be changed
>> by:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > ----------------------------
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > if (self.getView().contains(current.getId()) {
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > }
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > ---------------------------
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > You can see above this method the quorumPeer.getView() returns a
>> > > > Map<sid,
>> > > > > > QuorumServer> as below:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > -------------QuorumPeer ---------
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > /**
>> > > > > >  * A 'view' is a node's current opinion of the membership of the
>> > > entire
>> > > > > >  * ensemble.
>> > > > > >  */
>> > > > > > public Map<Long,QuorumPeer.QuorumServer> getView() {
>> > > > > >     return Collections.unmodifiableMap(getQuorumVerifier().
>> > > > > > getAllMembers());
>> > > > > > }
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > -----------------------------
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > And then it retrieves the QuorumServer that has many more
>> > information
>> > > > > > about the node besides the sid (InetSocketAddress, hostname,
>> etc).
>> > :)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Cheers,
>> > > > > > Edward
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
>> > eolive...@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> So I am trying to create a patch in order to expose on JMX the
>> id
>> > of
>> > > > the
>> > > > > >> current "leader" (on the JVM of a follower)
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> I am trying to find in ZK which is the variable which holds
>> the ID
>> > > of
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > >> current leader.
>> > > > > >> I am new to the internal of QuorumPeer
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Can someone give me some hint ?
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Enrico
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Il giorno mar 8 mag 2018 alle ore 10:08 Ansel Zandegran <
>> > > > > >> ansel.zandeg...@infor.com> ha scritto:
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> > Hi,
>> > > > > >> > That is possible with 4 letter commands. We are using it
>> now. In
>> > > > 3.5.x
>> > > > > >> it
>> > > > > >> > is going to be removed in favour of admin server (embedded
>> web
>> > > > > server).
>> > > > > >> > We are running in an environment where it’s not possible to
>> run
>> > > JMX
>> > > > or
>> > > > > >> > embedded web servers.
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > So I am wondering if there is another way? It would be nice
>> to
>> > > have
>> > > > > this
>> > > > > >> > info as a znode.
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > Best regards,
>> > > > > >> > Ansel
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > > On 8 May 2018, at 09:55, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > Hi Enrico,
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > You can determine the state of a server it via 4-letter
>> > > commands.
>> > > > > >> Would
>> > > > > >> > that work for you?
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > -Flavio
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > >> On 8 May 2018, at 09:09, Enrico Olivelli <
>> > eolive...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > > >> > >>
>> > > > > >> > >> Hi,
>> > > > > >> > >> is there any way to see in JMX which is the leader of a
>> > > ZooKeeper
>> > > > > >> > cluster?
>> > > > > >> > >>
>> > > > > >> > >> My problem is: given access to any of the nodes of the
>> > cluster
>> > > I
>> > > > > >> want to
>> > > > > >> > >> know from JMX which is the current leader.
>> > > > > >> > >> It seems to me that this information is not available, you
>> > can
>> > > > know
>> > > > > >> > only if
>> > > > > >> > >> the local node is Leader or Follower.
>> > > > > >> > >>
>> > > > > >> > >> Cheers
>> > > > > >> > >> Enrico
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
> --
>
>
> -- Enrico Olivelli
>

Reply via email to