[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16587496#comment-16587496 ]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1260: -------------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12823635/ZOOKEEPER-1260-01.patch against trunk revision 176bd68222f3a3bddac9deb412eee7f538cb01ca. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/3701//console This message is automatically generated. > Audit logging in ZooKeeper servers. > ----------------------------------- > > Key: ZOOKEEPER-1260 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1260 > Project: ZooKeeper > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: server > Reporter: Mahadev konar > Assignee: Mohammad Arshad > Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 3.6.0, 3.5.5 > > Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-1260-01.patch, zookeeperAuditLogs.pdf > > Time Spent: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Lots of users have had questions on debugging which client changed what znode > and what updates went through a znode. We should add audit logging as in > Hadoop (look at Namenode Audit logging) to log which client changed what in > the zookeeper servers. This could just be a log4j audit logger. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)