[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16587496#comment-16587496
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1260:
--------------------------------------

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12823635/ZOOKEEPER-1260-01.patch
  against trunk revision 176bd68222f3a3bddac9deb412eee7f538cb01ca.

    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests.

    -1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/3701//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Audit logging in ZooKeeper servers.
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-1260
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1260
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: server
>            Reporter: Mahadev konar
>            Assignee: Mohammad Arshad
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 3.6.0, 3.5.5
>
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-1260-01.patch, zookeeperAuditLogs.pdf
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Lots of users have had questions on debugging which client changed what znode 
> and what updates went through a znode. We should add audit logging as in 
> Hadoop (look at Namenode Audit logging) to log which client changed what in 
> the zookeeper servers. This could just be a log4j audit logger.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to