Hi Michael, Yes, there is a plan to have one more step, which will introduce zookeeper-server and zookeeper-common top level directory, and zookeeper-client-java under zookeeper-client. See ZOOKEEPER-3032 for an outlined final structure.
Regards, Norbert On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:15 PM Michael Han <h...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 for zookeeper-jute. > > A side question since we are at this - are there going to be more top level > folders that maps to current source structure- such as zookeeper-common, > zookeeper-cli, etc? > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Il mar 28 ago 2018, 23:37 Brian Nixon <brian.nixon...@gmail.com> ha > > scritto: > > > > > I still think it makes sense to keep it as a top level directory (would > > not > > > include it in recipes). 'zookeeper-jute' is certainly a reasonable > name. > > :) > > > > > > > +1 for zookeeper-jute > > > > Enrico > > > > > > > -Brian > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 7:59 AM Norbert Kalmar > > > <nkal...@cloudera.com.invalid> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > So jute is a little bit the odd one out in ZooKeeper. It was pulled > out > > > of > > > > Hadoop and it evolved independently since with ZooKeeper. And it has > > its > > > > own namespace in ZK: org.apache.jute beside org.apache.zookeeper. > > > > > > > > For me, this is a bit odd, it suggests its a top level apache > project. > > > > The original plan in the maven migration was to move jute to simply > in > > a > > > > "jute" top level directory in zookeeper. Like this: > > > > > > > > > > > > zookeeper | -bin | -conf | -jute | -zookeeper-client | > > > -zookeeper-contrib | > > > > -zookeeper-docs | -zookeeper-it (integration tests) | > > -zookeeper-server | > > > > -zookeeper-recipes > > > > > > > > But this just seems a bit strange to me. I was thinking of possibly > > > moving > > > > into recipes, but then again, I ended up thinking it could still get > > its > > > > own top level directory, but with the name "zookeeper-jute", as this > > > > particular project is only used by ZooKeeper (of course I would keep > > the > > > > package name intact). > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > As this is a change that was not in the initial doc about maven > > > migration, > > > > I thought it's best to ask. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Norbert > > > > > > > > p.s.: The best thing would be to use a more standardized library for > > > > serialization like protobuf or Avro. But that's just a distant dream > > > right > > > > now, maybe ZooKeeper v5.0 ;) > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli > > >
