Andor Molnar created ZOOKEEPER-3182:
---------------------------------------

             Summary: Race condition when follower syncing with leader and 
starting to server requests
                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-3182
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3182
             Project: ZooKeeper
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: server
    Affects Versions: 3.6.0
            Reporter: Andor Molnar


This issue is probably introduced by ZOOKEEPER-2024 where 2 seperate queues 
have been implemented in CommitProcessor to improve performance.
[~abrahamfine] 's analysis is accurate on GitHub: 
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/300

He was trying to introduce synchronization between Learner.syncWithLeader() and 
CommitProcessor to wait for in-flight requests to be committed before accepting 
client requests.

In the affected unit test (testNodeDataChanged) there's a race between 
reconnecting client's setWatches request and updates coming from the leader 
according to the following logs:

{noformat}
2018-10-25 13:59:58,556 [myid:] - DEBUG 
[FollowerRequestProcessor:1:CommitProcessor@424] - Processing request:: 
sessionid:0x10005d8fc4d0000 type:setWatches cxid:0x3 zxid:0xfffffffffffffffe 
txntype:unknown reqpath:n/a
2018-10-25 13:59:58,556 [myid:] - DEBUG 
[CommitProcWorkThread-1:FinalRequestProcessor@91] - Processing request:: 
sessionid:0x10005d8fc4d0000 type:setWatches cxid:0x3 zxid:0xfffffffffffffffe 
txntype:unknown reqpath:n/a
...
2018-10-25 13:59:58,557 [myid:] - DEBUG 
[CommitProcWorkThread-1:FinalRequestProcessor@91] - Processing request:: 
sessionid:0x20005d8f8a40000 type:delete cxid:0x1 zxid:0x100000004 txntype:2 
reqpath:n/a
...
2018-10-25 13:59:58,561 [myid:] - DEBUG 
[CommitProcWorkThread-1:FinalRequestProcessor@91] - Processing request:: 
sessionid:0x20005d8f8a40000 type:create cxid:0x2 zxid:0x100000005 txntype:1 
reqpath:n/a
2018-10-25 13:59:58,561 [myid:127.0.0.1:11231] - DEBUG 
[main-SendThread(127.0.0.1:11231):ClientCnxn$SendThread@864] - Got WatchedEvent 
state:SyncConnected type:NodeDeleted path:/test-changed for sessionid 
0x10005d8fc4d0000
{noformat}

{{setWatches}} request is processed before {{delete}} and {{create}}, hence the 
client receives NodeDeleted event.

In the working scenario it looks like:

{noformat}
2018-10-25 14:04:55,247 [myid:] - DEBUG 
[CommitProcWorkThread-1:FinalRequestProcessor@91] - Processing request:: 
sessionid:0x20005dd88110000 type:delete cxid:
0x1 zxid:0x100000004 txntype:2 reqpath:n/a
2018-10-25 14:04:55,249 [myid:] - DEBUG 
[CommitProcWorkThread-1:FinalRequestProcessor@91] - Processing request:: 
sessionid:0x20005dd88110000 type:create cxid:
0x2 zxid:0x100000005 txntype:1 reqpath:n/a
...
2018-10-25 14:04:56,314 [myid:] - DEBUG 
[FollowerRequestProcessor:1:CommitProcessor@424] - Processing request:: 
sessionid:0x10005dd88110000 type:setWatches cxid:0x3 zxid:0xfffffffffffffffe 
txntype:unknown reqpath:n/a
2018-10-25 14:04:56,315 [myid:] - DEBUG 
[CommitProcWorkThread-1:FinalRequestProcessor@91] - Processing request:: 
sessionid:0x10005dd88110000 type:setWatches cxid:0x3 zxid:0xfffffffffffffffe 
txntype:unknown reqpath:n/a
...
2018-10-25 14:04:56,316 [myid:127.0.0.1:11231] - DEBUG 
[main-SendThread(127.0.0.1:11231):ClientCnxn$SendThread@842] - Got notification 
sessionid:0x10005dd88110000
2018-10-25 14:04:56,316 [myid:127.0.0.1:11231] - DEBUG 
[main-SendThread(127.0.0.1:11231):ClientCnxn$SendThread@864] - Got WatchedEvent 
state:SyncConnected type:NodeDataChanged path:/test-changed for sessionid 
0x10005dd88110000
{noformat}

{{delete}} and {{create}} requests happen way before {{setWatches}} comes in 
(even before the client connection is established.

Abe's approach unfortunately raises the following concerns:
- modifies CommitProcessor's code which might affect performance and 
correctness ([~shralex] raised on ZOOKEEPER-2807),
- we experienced deadlocks while testing the patch: 
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/300

As a consequence I raised this Jira the capture the experiences and to put the 
unit test on Ignore list, because currenty I'm not sure about whether this is a 
real issue or a non-backward compatible change in 3.6 with the gain of a huge 
performance improvement.

Either way I don't want this flaky test to influence contributions, so I'll 
mark as Ignored on trunk until the issue is resolved.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to