[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16827101#comment-16827101
]
Tamas Penzes edited comment on ZOOKEEPER-102 at 4/26/19 4:23 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Based on the size of the task I think it would worth to discuss which option to
choose.
[~maoling] would you start a DISCUSS thread on the dev mailing list to collect
the pros and cons of the options?
was (Author: tamaas):
Based on the size of the task I think it would worth to discuss which option to
choose.
[~maoling] would you start a DISCUSS thread on the mailing list to collect the
pros and cons of the options?
> Need to replace Jute with supported code
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-102
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-102
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Benjamin Reed
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 4.0.0
>
>
> ZooKeeper currently uses Jute to serialize objects to put on the wire and on
> disk. We pulled Jute out of Hadoop and added a C binding. Both versions of
> Jute have evolved (although Hadoop still doesn't have a C binding). It would
> be nice to use a more standard serialization library. Some options include
> Thrift or Google's protocol buffers.
> Our main requirements would be Java and C bindings and good performance. (For
> example, serializing to XML would give us incredibly bad performance and
> would not be acceptible!)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
