PR for the fix
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1111
as soon as it lands to 3.5.6 I will send a new RC out for vote

in BookKeeper we have a validation script that checks for license files,
but it depends on the repository layout.

it should be easy to set up such validation, it will also help contributors
to work on libraries upgrade


Enrico

Il giorno lun 7 ott 2019 alle ore 15:33 Norbert Kalmar
<[email protected]> ha scritto:

> Oh, bummer, I totally overlooked the version in the configs.
>
> We should maybe add some automated config checks to the build... :) This is
> not the first time an RC is cancelled because of the License files.
>
> Norbert
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 3:13 PM Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Andor, Norbert,
> > I have fixed the tag
> > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/commits/release-3.5.6-rc3
> >
> > Explanation of what happeed:
> > I had created the original tag as 'release-3.5.6rc3' (without the dash
> > sign) and when I re-created it I was on the master branch.
> > I apologize for the mistake.
> >
> > Binaries and source code were takes from this commit
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/commit/3433841cb8e8ed1e1a3ef65e6e986aae3de55677
> >
> > But I am sorry as I have to CANCEL again this vote, as inside the "lib"
> > directory we still have Netty 4.1.29 license files instead of 4.1.42.
> >
> > so -1 from my side.
> >
> > I am sorry this is taking so long.
> >
> > Fortunately ZK codebase is in good shape, we are only cancelling votes
> for
> > third party dependencies and license files
> >
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Il giorno lun 7 ott 2019 alle ore 14:27 Norbert Kalmar
> > <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding) - once tag is fixed, which has the extra commit Andor
> > > mentioned. I verified that the RC does not contain the commit, so it's
> > just
> > > the tag.
> > > But the RC looks good to me!
> > >
> > > - unit tests pass
> > > - built and started ZK + run few commands from source tarball
> > > - checked bin tarball, license files, run ZK + few commands
> > > - signature OK.
> > >
> > > Thanks Enrico!
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 2:01 PM Andor Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +0
> > > >
> > > > Release artifacts looks good to me:
> > > > - verified Release Notes,
> > > > - verified signatures, checksum,
> > > > - code built on Mac, Centos7
> > > > - tests were successful, including C++ tests,
> > > > - verified 3-node cluster non-ssl, ssl mode with some basic cli
> > commands.
> > > >
> > > > However the git tag “release-3.5.6-rc3” does not seem to be right: it
> > > > points to commit: 768ac0fe which is a master-only commit with Jira
> id:
> > > > ZOOKEEPER-3532 (docker stuff).
> > > >
> > > > It should point to the latest commit on branch-3.5.6 instead:
> 3433841c
> > > >
> > > > (I’ll change my vote to +1 once the tag is fixed.)
> > > >
> > > > Andor
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On 2019. Oct 5., at 18:34, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.5.6.
> > > > >
> > > > > It fixes 29 issues, including upgrade of third party libraries,
> > > > > TTL Node APIs for C API, support for PCKS12 Keystores, upgrade of
> > > Netty 4
> > > > > and better procedure for the upgrade of servers from 3.4 to 3.5.
> > > > >
> > > > > The full release notes is available at:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801&version=12345243
> > > > >
> > > > > *** Please download, test and vote by October 8nd 2019, 23:59
> UTC+0.
> > > ***
> > > > >
> > > > > Source files:
> > > > > https://people.apache.org/~eolivelli/zookeeper-3.5.6-candidate-3
> > > > >
> > > > > Maven staging repo:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachezookeeper-1043/
> > > > >
> > > > > The release candidate tag in git to be voted upon:
> release-3.5.6-rc3
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/tree/release-3.5.6-rc3
> > > > >
> > > > > ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> release:
> > > > > https://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > Should we release this candidate?
> > > > >
> > > > > Enrico Olivelli
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to