If you haven't already I'd recommend reaching out 1:1 with each of the pmc
members. That will usually turn up at least a couple.

Regards,

Patrick


On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 2:21 PM Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thank you all, we need one more PMC +1 in order to validate the candidate.
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno ven 11 ott 2019 alle ore 08:55 Zili Chen <[email protected]>
> ha scritto:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > + verify source tarball contains no binary files
> > + verify binary tarball contains no source files
> >
> > + locally build by `mvn clean install -DskipTests -Pfull-build)` and
> verify
> > by `mvn verify`, tests pass
> >
> > + Verified basic zookeeper operation through Cli
> >
> > Best,
> > tison.
> >
> >
> > Mohammad arshad <[email protected]> 于2019年10月11日周五 下午2:38写道:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > Verified checksums and signature
> > > Run UT on ubuntu 16.04 with jdk1.8.0_221 with non-root user. All 2554
> UTs
> > > passed
> > > Verified basic zk operation through Cli
> > > Executed 4 letter word commands
> > > Verified admin server commands
> > > Ran rat
> > > All are OK :-)
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks & Regards
> > > Mohammad Arshad
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: sujith simon [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 11:32 AM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > - Verified Checksum
> > > - Verified Signature
> > > - Verfied that tags are correct
> > > - Verified build, installed ZooKeeper and tested basic commands from
> > > source tarball
> > > - Installed ZooKeeper from bin tarball on a 3 node cluster and tested
> > > basic ZooKeeper commands
> > > - Verified that Unit tests are passing
> > >
> > > Thanks :)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:53 PM Norbert Kalmar
> > > <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > - unit tests pass
> > > > - built and started ZK + run few commands from source tarball
> > > > - checked bin tarball, license files, run ZK + few commands
> > > > - signature OK.
> > > > - git tag OK :)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Enrico!
> > > >
> > > > Norbert
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:45 PM Andor Molnar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Verified…
> > > > >
> > > > > - checksums, signature,
> > > > > - unit tests
> > > > > - 3-node cluster smoke tests.
> > > > >
> > > > > Andor
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 2019. Oct 9., at 22:40, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Il mer 9 ott 2019, 21:14 Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> ha
> > scritto:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> +1 checksums/sig validated. rat ran clean and I was able to
> build
> > > > > >> +and
> > > > > >> exercise the code just fine with java 8.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Note dep check is failing again however:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> jackson-databind-2.9.10.jar
> > > > > >> (pkg:maven/com.fasterxml.jackson.core/[email protected],
> > > > > >> cpe:2.3:a:fasterxml:jackson:2.9.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*,
> > > > > >> cpe:2.3:a:fasterxml:jackson-databind:2.9.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) :
> > > > > >> CVE-2019-16942, CVE-2019-16943
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I looked at the issue and they seem very specific, given that
> and
> > > > > >> the status of databind these days I think we should get this one
> > > > > >> next time around vs re-re... spinning the rc. What do you think?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Agreed.
> > > > > > And as we are doing a very limited use of Jackson we can look for
> > > > > > a replacement
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Enrico
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Patrick
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:46 PM Enrico Olivelli
> > > > > >> <[email protected]>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.5.6.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> It fixes 29 issues, including upgrade of third party libraries,
> > > > > >>> TTL Node APIs for C API, support for PCKS12 Keystores, upgrade
> > > > > >>> of
> > > > > Netty 4
> > > > > >>> and better procedure for the upgrade of servers from 3.4 to
> 3.5.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> The full release notes is available at:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310
> > > > 801&version=12345243
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> *** Please download, test and vote by October 11th 2019, 23:59
> > > UTC+0.
> > > > > ***
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Source files:
> > > > > >>>
> https://people.apache.org/~eolivelli/zookeeper-3.5.6-candidate-4
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Maven staging repo:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachezookeeper-
> > > > 1044
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> The release candidate tag in git to be voted upon:
> > > > > >>> release-3.5.6-rc4
> > > > > >>> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/tree/release-3.5.6-rc4
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> > > release:
> > > > > >>> https://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Should we release this candidate?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Enrico Olivelli
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to