David, highly appreciated your contributions. Looking forward to more. Please go ahead!
----- Original Message ----- From: Norbert Kalmar <[email protected]> To: DevZooKeeper <[email protected]> Subject: Re: My Contributions Date: 2020-02-03 18:34 Hi David, Thanks for your contributions! We consider the patch committed if it should be backported or not. In my opinion if a contributor finds a bug/improvement to do, we can't expect him/her to know what branches this should be committed to. Of course if the author takes the time to dig through the different branches and suggests to backport or not, than that's great, but just creating a patch against master works just as well :) And of course sometimes (a great example is security fixes) we just automatically backport the change to all (or just some) branch still maintained. And one more thing: anyone is in a position to drive big changes, ZooKeeper is open source, contributors are welcomed :) (Of course depending on how big a change, it might be worth starting on this dev list to vote / give a heads up / ask for help). Regards, Norbert On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 6:04 AM David Mollitor <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Team, > > I have very much appreciated all of the support and merging of my PRs. I > just wanted to clarify / get clarification of the ZK release process. > > I'm not in a position to drive any big changes or big big fixes into the > product. I'm just trying to keep the code clean, keeping down the lines of > code. and to hopefully preventing others from making mistakes,... and maybe > add a percentage point or two on performance. > > Unless I suggest otherwise, I intend all of my work to be pushed into > master. No need to back port it to existing released versions. Typically, > only big fixes are added to such releases. > > All the more reason to not back port my work to past releases, several big > users are consuming changes from trunk anyway. So my changes are being > consumed pretty quickly and do not need to go out in previous releases to > add value. > > Thanks, > David >
