p3 is fine with me. Trying to maintain multiple can be a hassle and p2 is EOL already.
Patrick On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:19 AM Norbert Kalmar <nkal...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote: > +1 for v3 only (I have both v2/v3 interpreters, but as you mentioned, we > should only need to maintain 1 script). > > - Norbert > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 1:35 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Il giorno lun 30 mar 2020 alle ore 13:33 Andor Molnar > > <an...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > We have a nice PR about upgrading the commit script to Python3: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1295 > > > > > > I think we could just drop the previous v2 version with no problem, but > > folks on the PR would like to keep it. > > > Source control keeps the old version anyway and we wouldn’t need to > > maintain 2 scripts in the long run. Is there anybody (committer) who > > doesn’t have python3 interpreter? > > > > > > Additionally Py2 is already EoL since this January. > > > > I am fine with Python3 only. > > > > Enrico > > > > > > > > > > Andor > > > > > > > > >
