Il Mar 28 Apr 2020, 14:38 Mate Szalay-Beko <msza...@cloudera.com.invalid> ha scritto:
> Hello Guys, > > I am collecting what we might miss for the 3.5.8 release. > > I want to finish a few things in the following days: > - ZOOKEEPER-3727: Fix 3.5 source tarball to represent the git repository > - ZOOKEEPER-3810: a bugfix that I want to backport from 3.6, PR ready > - a few small document fixes that were merged to 3.6, but haven't got > merged to 3.5 due to merge conflicts: > - ZOOKEEPER-3357 > - ZOOKEEPER-3355 > - ZOOKEEPER-3751 Jackson upgrade to fix CVEs, I think it needs to be > backported to branch-3.5 as well > - I'll also look for other CVEs. > > Andor just wrote he is working on backporting parts of ZOOKEEPER-3739 > (Handle Java 9/11 additions of covariant return types to > java.nio.ByteBuffer methods). > > Does anyone else want to include / know about anything else I should wait > for? > Nothing from my side Thank you! Enrico > Thanks, > Mate > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 2:25 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Il Ven 17 Apr 2020, 13:43 Szalay-Bekő Máté <szalay.beko.m...@gmail.com> > ha > > scritto: > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > On the branch 3.5 we have quite a few CVE fixes (netty, jackson) and > bug > > > fixes (e.g. fix build on JDK14 and fix three different leader election > > > bugs, etc.). Plus we have the backward compatibility fix of > > > Version.getRevision in ZOOKEEPER-3780. > > > > > > see the resolved/closed Jira issues tagged with 3.5.8: > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3780?jql=project%20%3D%20ZOOKEEPER%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.5.8 > > > > > > I was wondering if we should do a 3.5.8 release soon (maybe after we > > > finished 3.6.1). What do you think? > > > > > > 2.5.7 was released on 14 February. How often we supposed to do bugfix > > > releases? > > > > > > > There is no fixed schedule. > > If we have enough stuff and it is worth to cut a release than it can be > the > > time for it > > > > > > > I am happy to volunteer as a release manager if you agree that it would > > > make sense. > > > > > > > Sure > > > > I think this release is needed especially for the problems we addressed > > and the compatibility issue with HBase > > > > Thanks for volunteering > > > > Enrico > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > Mate > > > > > >
