Hi Andor,

I am interested in working on this issue, but I need some time to
understand the problem and start working on the fix. Please let me know if
this is urgent and needs a fix asap. Thank you.

Best,
gowrima

On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 9:50 AM Andor Molnár <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've refreshed my memory about the issue and the proposed patch. Looks
> like we didn’t reach a clear agreement on how to resolve the problem. The
> patch is about introducing a configurable limit to the number of ephemeral
> znodes, while @kezhu suggested [1] to get rid of fuzzy snapshots based on
> [2].
>
> #1716 has a -1 from @eolivelli, so I cannot immediately merge it.
>
> Can we come back to this problem as a team and discuss how to move forward?
> Is there anybody who’s willing to work on ZOOKEEPER-4874?
> Do you think ZOOKEEPER-4874 would be acceptable to backport to branch-3.9?
>
> Thanks,
> Andor
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1716#issuecomment-2421056078
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4874
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 12, 2026, at 08:12, Дмитрий Дужинский <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We've hit ZOOKEEPER-4306 (CloseSessionTxn exceeding jute.maxbuffer takes
> down the whole ensemble) twice in production, in two independent
> deployments — I've also left a comment on the JIRA.
> >
> > PR #1716 has been open since 2021 and was rebased in Oct 2024 with a
> branch-3.9 backport (#2201), but both seem to have stalled since.
> >
> > Is anything still blocking them? If the 2021 review comments are the
> remaining concern, we'd be glad to help address them
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4306
> > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1716
> > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/2201
>
>

Reply via email to