On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 13:49:43 +0700 Антон Мидюков wrote: > Как будет выглядеть строка license в спеке, если нужно указать > одновременно GPL-3.0 и Apache-2.0?
/usr/share/doc/rpm-build-licenses-2.0.5/README: Questions & Answers: Q1: What if a package contains parts under different licenses? A: Consider splitting the package into subpackages. If it is not feasible for some reason, mention both licenses, separating them with a comma, e.g.: %gpl2plus, %lgpl2plus Q2: What if a package can be distributed under several licenses? A: Mention the applicable licenses, separating them with a pipe sign or 'or' word (NOT with a slash), e.g.: %mpl|%gpl2plus|lgpl2plus (Firefox license) %gpl2plus or %artistic_license (Perl license; better use %perl_license) Q3: Why shouldn't I use a slash to separate licenses? A: Because of an ambiguity. Consider "GPL/LGPL v.2" that usually means "GPLv2+, LGPLv2+" (as in FAQ1) and "GPL/Artistic" (Perl license that means "Either GPL or Artistic". The initial proposal was here: http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel/2007-August/049382.html (in Russian). -- WBR, Mikhail Efremov _______________________________________________ devel-newbies mailing list [email protected] https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-newbies
